Kirkpatrick P, d'Ardenne A J
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jun;37(6):639-44. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.6.639.
The effects of different fixatives and enzymatic digestion procedures on the immunohistochemical demonstration of fibronectin and laminin in paraffin embedded tissues have been compared. None of the fixatives tested enabled staining of these proteins without enzymatic digestion. No intracytoplasmic laminin was found either in fixed or in fresh frozen tissue. Fixation in formol acetic acid was unsatisfactory for demonstration of fibronectin; prolonged fixation in formol sublimate was unsatisfactory for demonstration of laminin. Optimal results were achieved after fixation in routine 10% formol saline. Trypsin was completely ineffective for unmasking laminin antigens except after fixation in ethanol acetic acid; it was only partially effective for showing fibronectin antigens. The best results were obtained with protease digestion, but pepsin was an adequate, although slightly less reliable, alternative. These enzymes may be used at lower concentrations than usually recommended.
比较了不同固定剂和酶消化程序对石蜡包埋组织中纤连蛋白和层粘连蛋白免疫组织化学显示的影响。所测试的固定剂无一能在不进行酶消化的情况下使这些蛋白质染色。在固定组织或新鲜冷冻组织中均未发现胞质内层粘连蛋白。甲醛醋酸固定对于纤连蛋白的显示不满意;升汞甲醛长时间固定对于层粘连蛋白的显示不满意。常规10%甲醛生理盐水固定后可获得最佳结果。胰蛋白酶除在乙醇醋酸固定后外,对暴露层粘连蛋白抗原完全无效;对显示纤连蛋白抗原仅部分有效。蛋白酶消化可获得最佳结果,但胃蛋白酶是一种足够的替代方法,尽管可靠性稍差。这些酶可使用比通常推荐浓度更低的浓度。