Suppr超能文献

气道死腔、呼气末二氧化碳分压与克里斯蒂安·玻尔

Airway deadspace, end-tidal CO2, and Christian Bohr.

作者信息

Fletcher R

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1984 Aug;28(4):408-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1984.tb02088.x.

Abstract

In order to calculate alveolar deadspace, an important measure of ventilation/perfusion mismatching, it is necessary to measure airway or anatomical deadspace (VDaw) and physiological deadspace. VDaw is usually measured graphically or by similar means, but sometimes it is estimated from a formula, based on Christian Bohr's work, in which end-tidal PCO2 is used as a measure of alveolar PCO2. In 58 patients undergoing anaesthesia and positive pressure ventilation, there were large errors in this estimate of VDaw compared to a graphical method. At tidal volumes of 400-500 ml, the median error was 34 ml; at larger tidal volumes, the median error increased to 74 ml (P less than 0.001). The size of the error was correlated to the slope of phase III, the part of the CO2 tracing representing alveolar CO2, at both ventilator settings (P less than 0.01). It is concluded that estimates of VDaw based on end-tidal PCO2 are unreliable, and their use will lead to a large part of the alveolar deadspace being wrongly accredited to VDaw.

摘要

为了计算肺泡死腔(通气/灌注不匹配的一项重要指标),有必要测量气道或解剖死腔(VDaw)以及生理死腔。VDaw通常通过图形法或类似方法进行测量,但有时也会根据克里斯蒂安·玻尔的研究成果,利用一个公式进行估算,该公式以呼气末PCO2作为肺泡PCO2的测量指标。在58例接受麻醉和正压通气的患者中,与图形法相比,这种VDaw估算方法存在较大误差。在潮气量为400 - 500毫升时,中位误差为34毫升;在较大潮气量时,中位误差增至74毫升(P小于0.001)。在两种通气设置下,误差大小均与二氧化碳描记图中代表肺泡二氧化碳的III期斜率相关(P小于0.01)。得出的结论是,基于呼气末PCO2的VDaw估算不可靠,使用这种方法会导致大部分肺泡死腔被错误地归因于VDaw。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验