Papasian C J, Bartholomew W R, Amsterdam D
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):641-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.641-643.1984.
A commercial modification of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Gonozyme; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae antigens was compared with conventional culturing. Specimens from males and females were collected at a sexually transmitted disease clinic; additional female specimens were collected at an obstetrics and gynecology clinic. EIA sensitivity and specificity for males were 100 and 98.6%, respectively (68 negative, 34 positive, 1 false-positive, and 0 false-negative). EIA sensitivity and specificity for female sexually transmitted disease clinic patients were 74.4 and 95.7%, respectively (66 negative, 29 positive, 3 false-positive, and 10 false-negative) EIA sensitivity and specificity for obstetrics and gynecology clinic patients were 100 and 99.2%, respectively (6 positive, 119 negative, 1 false-positive, and 0 false-negative). In female patients from whom multiple swab specimens were collected, the sequence of specimen collection and subsequent EIA analysis affected sensitivity.
将一种用于检测淋病奈瑟菌抗原的酶免疫测定(EIA)(Gonozyme;雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州北芝加哥)的商业改良方法与传统培养法进行了比较。在一家性传播疾病诊所收集了男性和女性的标本;在一家妇产科诊所收集了更多女性标本。EIA对男性的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和98.6%(68例阴性,34例阳性,1例假阳性,0例假阴性)。EIA对女性性传播疾病诊所患者的敏感性和特异性分别为74.4%和95.7%(66例阴性,29例阳性,3例假阳性,10例假阴性)。EIA对妇产科诊所患者的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和99.2%(6例阳性,119例阴性,1例假阳性,0例假阴性)。在收集了多个拭子标本的女性患者中,标本收集顺序及随后的EIA分析会影响敏感性。