Hann I M, Prentice H G
Clin Haematol. 1984 Oct;13(3):523-47.
The last two decades have seen some significant advances made in the recognition of infection problems in the immunocompromised host and in their prevention in a rapidly expanding population. Many areas urgently await much-needed improvements, particularly anti-bacterial decontamination and fungal and viral prophylaxis. Despite interesting pilot studies there has been a failure to fully evaluate potential strategies in properly designed trials. Now is the time for large studies which control for the multitudinous variables of patient population such as disease status, protective environment, degree of diet sterility, and types of GI and mucocutaneous decontamination. Meanwhile, it is impossible to make hard and fast rules for prophylaxis for all circumstances. Clearly, most of the measures which we have discussed are applicable only where there is profound immunosuppression. Practice should be based on a careful evaluation of the local flora and fauna. Table 6 details an outline of the Royal Free prophylaxis schedule concurrently used during the treatment of acute non-lymphoblastic leukaemia and following marrow transplantation. This type of protocol is an attempt at short-term 'total' decontamination which appears justifiable in this very high-risk group where the invading organisms are a greater immediate risk than the disease under treatment. Our hope is that the scientific foundations for such regimens will rest on firmer ground in the future.
在过去二十年里,在认识免疫功能低下宿主的感染问题以及在快速增长的人群中预防感染方面取得了一些重大进展。许多领域迫切需要亟需的改进,特别是抗菌去污以及真菌和病毒预防。尽管有一些有趣的试点研究,但未能在设计合理的试验中充分评估潜在策略。现在是开展大型研究的时候了,这些研究要控制患者群体的众多变量,如疾病状态、保护环境、饮食无菌程度以及胃肠道和黏膜皮肤去污类型。与此同时,不可能为所有情况制定严格的预防规则。显然,我们讨论的大多数措施仅适用于存在严重免疫抑制的情况。实践应基于对当地菌群的仔细评估。表6详细列出了在急性非淋巴细胞白血病治疗期间和骨髓移植后同时使用的皇家自由医院预防方案概要。这种方案是一种短期“全面”去污的尝试,在这个极高风险群体中似乎是合理的,因为入侵的生物体比正在治疗的疾病构成更大的直接风险。我们希望此类方案的科学基础在未来将更加坚实。