Suppr超能文献

光、音调及间隙的感知时长中的视听冲突。

Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones and gaps.

作者信息

Walker J T, Scott K J

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Dec;7(6):1327-39. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.7.6.1327.

Abstract

The perceived duration of a short tone (1,000 or 1,500 msec) was longer than that of a separately presented light of equal length. Thus, when light and tone were presented simultaneously, there was a conflict in perceived duration. In that case, the perceived duration of an interval filled with both light and tone was close to that of an interval filled with tone alone. A silent gap in otherwise continuous tone was perceived as longer than a gap in otherwise continuous light, and the perceived duration of a gap occurring simultaneously in both light and tone was close to that of a gap in tone alone. Thus, auditory dominance occurred under the preceding conditions-that is, auditory-visual conflicts in perceived duration, whether occurring between filled intervals or gaps, were resolved in favor of the auditory modality. Visual dominance occurred only under one condition, in which the intensity of tone was reduced, and in which the perceived duration of a 500-msec light was longer than that of a 500-msec tone. The finding of auditory dominance in the perception of time runs counter to the results of studies of sensory conflicts in spatial perception, where vision typically dominates audition and touch.

摘要

一个短音(1000或1500毫秒)的感知时长比单独呈现的等长光线的时长更长。因此,当光线和声音同时呈现时,在感知时长上就会产生冲突。在这种情况下,充满光线和声音的间隔的感知时长接近于仅充满声音的间隔的感知时长。在连续的声音中出现的无声间隙被感知为比在连续的光线中出现的间隙更长,并且在光线和声音中同时出现的间隙的感知时长接近于仅在声音中出现的间隙的感知时长。因此,在前述条件下出现了听觉主导——也就是说,在感知时长方面的视听冲突,无论发生在充满刺激的间隔还是间隙之间,都以有利于听觉模态的方式得到解决。视觉主导仅在一种条件下出现,即声音强度降低,且500毫秒光线的感知时长比500毫秒声音的感知时长更长。在时间感知中听觉主导这一发现与空间感知中感觉冲突的研究结果相反,在空间感知中视觉通常主导听觉和触觉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验