Orvaschel H, Thompson W D, Belanger A, Prusoff B A, Kidd K K
J Affect Disord. 1982 Mar;4(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(82)90019-2.
This study compares information on the diagnosis of depression obtained by family history reports with the formation obtained by direct interview. Reports were obtained from family members on the psychiatric status of 696 individuals for whom direct SADS-L interviews were also available. The effects on family history reports of subjects characteristics, treatment status, age of onset of depression, and endogenous symptoms were examined. Sensitivity and specificity for family history reports on the specific symptoms of depression are also reported. The specificity of family history reports for the diagnosis of depression was consistently high but sensitivity varied as a function of subject and illness characteristics. Sensitivity was somewhat higher for females than males and appreciably higher for probands than for their first-degree relatives and spouses. Sensitivity was increased whenever treatment, hospitalization or endogenous symptoms were present in the subject, indicating that family history reports are most accurate for detecting the severest cases of depression. Finally, the symptoms of depression that are least accurately reported by relatives are identified and suggestions for modifying the family history criteria for depression are proposed.
