Suppr超能文献

关于旋光性起源的不同见解。一种生物体内的解释。

Dissident remarks on the origin of optical activity. An intrabiological explanation.

作者信息

Broda E

出版信息

Orig Life. 1984;14(1-4):391-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00933682.

Abstract

The attempts to explain the origin of natural optical activity through external, extrabiological, agents, typically ionizing rays, i.e. as a purely incidental effect without deeper significance, have failed and should be abandoned. An alternative, intrabiological, Darwinian, explanation seeks to explain optical activity as a necessary phenomenon in early evolution. This explanation is based on the idea that organisms with the existing stereospecificity initially happened, by chance, to be more efficient than organisms with the opposite stereospecificity on independent grounds that have nothing to do with their stereospecificity. If cells based on L aminoacids are called L cells, it is to be assumed that cosmic bodies carrying L cells are about equally frequent as those carrying D cells.

摘要

试图通过外部的、非生物的因素,通常是电离射线,来解释天然旋光性的起源,即把它当作一种没有更深层意义的纯粹偶然效应,这种尝试已经失败,应该被摒弃。另一种基于生物体内的、达尔文式的解释试图将旋光性解释为早期进化中的一种必然现象。这种解释基于这样一种观点,即具有现有立体特异性的生物体最初偶然地比具有相反立体特异性的生物体更高效,其依据与它们的立体特异性无关。如果将基于L氨基酸的细胞称为L细胞,那么可以假定携带L细胞的天体与携带D细胞的天体出现的频率大致相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验