Suppr超能文献

关于旋光性起源的不同见解。一种生物体内的解释。

Dissident remarks on the origin of optical activity. An intrabiological explanation.

作者信息

Broda E

出版信息

Orig Life. 1984;14(1-4):391-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00933682.

Abstract

The attempts to explain the origin of natural optical activity through external, extrabiological, agents, typically ionizing rays, i.e. as a purely incidental effect without deeper significance, have failed and should be abandoned. An alternative, intrabiological, Darwinian, explanation seeks to explain optical activity as a necessary phenomenon in early evolution. This explanation is based on the idea that organisms with the existing stereospecificity initially happened, by chance, to be more efficient than organisms with the opposite stereospecificity on independent grounds that have nothing to do with their stereospecificity. If cells based on L aminoacids are called L cells, it is to be assumed that cosmic bodies carrying L cells are about equally frequent as those carrying D cells.

摘要

试图通过外部的、非生物的因素,通常是电离射线,来解释天然旋光性的起源,即把它当作一种没有更深层意义的纯粹偶然效应,这种尝试已经失败,应该被摒弃。另一种基于生物体内的、达尔文式的解释试图将旋光性解释为早期进化中的一种必然现象。这种解释基于这样一种观点,即具有现有立体特异性的生物体最初偶然地比具有相反立体特异性的生物体更高效,其依据与它们的立体特异性无关。如果将基于L氨基酸的细胞称为L细胞,那么可以假定携带L细胞的天体与携带D细胞的天体出现的频率大致相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验