Ogden J A
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Sep(188):68-73.
Fourteen patients with separation of the distal clavicular metaphysis from the epiphysis were reviewed. These injuries, especially in the older child and adolescent, mimic acromioclavicular separation. However, they are really growth-plate injuries in which the epiphysis and physis maintain their normal anatomic relation to the shoulder joint, while the distal metaphysis is displaced superiorly, away from the underlying structures. The periosteal sleeve is generally intact inferiorly, and the ligamentous structures connecting the clavicle to the coracoid usually remain attached to the periosteal sleeve. Depending on the degree of displacement, these patients may be treated by either closed methods or pin fixation. The periosteal sleeve is usually extremely osteogenic and will readily fill in any gap between the periosteum and metaphysis. In fact, in one patient this led to clavicular "duplication" and necessitated resection of the original distal clavicle. In the skeletally immature patient it is extremely important to recognize that these physeal injuries are discrete from acromioclavicular separation.
回顾了14例锁骨远端干骺端与骨骺分离的患者。这些损伤,尤其是在较大儿童和青少年中,类似于肩锁关节分离。然而,它们实际上是生长板损伤,其中骨骺和骺板与肩关节保持正常的解剖关系,而远端干骺端向上移位,远离其下方的结构。骨膜袖通常在下方完整,连接锁骨与喙突的韧带结构通常仍附着于骨膜袖。根据移位程度,这些患者可采用闭合方法或克氏针固定治疗。骨膜袖通常具有极强的成骨性,会很容易填充骨膜与干骺端之间的任何间隙。事实上,在1例患者中,这导致了锁骨“重复”,需要切除原来的远端锁骨。对于骨骼未成熟的患者,认识到这些骺板损伤与肩锁关节分离不同极为重要。