Suppr超能文献

穿着防毒服对心肺和体温的影响。

Cardiorespiratory and thermal effects of wearing gas protective clothing.

作者信息

Smolander J, Louhevaara V, Tuomi T, Korhonen O, Jaakkola J

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1984;54(3):261-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00379055.

Abstract

Six healthy men aged 25 to 37 walked on a treadmill at work levels of 21 and 41% of their VO2max for 25 to 30 min wearing gas protective clothing (GPC) consisting of an impermeable suit with a self-contained breathing apparatus (total weight 25 kg) or shorts (control tests, CT) in a temperate environment (ta 24.3 degrees C +/- 1.0 degrees C, rh 30-50%). When the GPC was worn at 21 and 41% VO2max, the most prominent increases, compared with the CT, were noted in the heart rate (means +/- SE, 120 +/- 5 vs 76 +/- 3 beats min-1 and 171 +/- 5 vs 103 +/- 3 beats min-1), mean skin temperature (36.1 +/- 0.2 vs 31.3 degrees C +/- 0.1 degree C and 36.9 +/- 0.3 vs 30.9 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C) and sweat rate (473 +/- 51 vs 70 +/- 23 g m-2 h-1 and 766 +/- 81 vs 135 +/- 18 g m-2 h-1) indicating a high cardiovascular and thermoregulatory strain, which was not decreased by ventilating the suit with an air flow of 281 min-1 at 41% VO2max. The ventilation, oxygen consumption and production of carbon dioxide increased in relation to the extra weight of the GPC, partly dependent on the dynamic work level. It was concluded that the increase in the physiological load caused by the GPC was so high that the work-rest regimens, workers' level of physical fitness, cardiovascular health and heat tolerance should be considered whenever gas protective clothing is used.

摘要

六名年龄在25至37岁之间的健康男性,在温度适中的环境(气温24.3摄氏度±1.0摄氏度,相对湿度30 - 50%)中,穿着由不透气套装和自给式呼吸器组成的防毒服(总重25千克)或短裤(对照试验,CT),在跑步机上以其最大摄氧量(VO2max)的21%和41%的工作强度行走25至30分钟。当穿着防毒服以VO2max的21%和41%强度行走时,与对照试验相比,心率(平均值±标准误,分别为120±5次/分钟对76±3次/分钟以及171±5次/分钟对103±3次/分钟)、平均皮肤温度(36.1±0.2摄氏度对31.3摄氏度±0.1摄氏度以及36.9±0.3摄氏度对30.9摄氏度±0.4摄氏度)和出汗率(473±51克/平方米·小时对70±23克/平方米·小时以及766±81克/平方米·小时对135±18克/平方米·小时)出现最显著的增加,表明心血管和体温调节负担很重,且在以VO2max的41%强度行走时,用28升/分钟的气流对套装进行通风也未能减轻这种负担。通风量、氧气消耗量和二氧化碳产生量随着防毒服额外重量的增加而增加,部分取决于动态工作强度。得出的结论是,防毒服导致的生理负荷增加非常大,以至于在使用防毒服时,应考虑工作 - 休息方案、工人的身体素质水平、心血管健康状况和耐热性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验