Louhevaara V, Tuomi T, Smolander J, Korhonen O, Tossavainen A, Jaakkola J
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1985;55(3):195-206. doi: 10.1007/BF00383753.
Twenty-one workers in the construction, foundry, shipyard, and metal industries, and nine firemen were studied in jobs that require the regular use of various industrial respirators. The subjects' heart rates (HR) were continuously recorded during 1 to 2 workshifts or during special tasks. Their oxygen consumption (VO2) and ventilation rates were measured during main work phases. The subjects' VO2max were determined by a submaximal bicycle-ergometer test. In construction and industrial jobs, when a filtering device or an air-line apparatus was worn, the subjects' mean HR-values ranged from 66 to 132 beats min-1, which is equivalent to a relative aerobic strain of 12 to 57% VO2max. In smog-diving and repair and rescue tasks with self-contained breathing apparatus and protective clothing, the corresponding mean values were 142 to 160 beats min-1 and 54-74% VO2, respectively. The field results were compared with those measured in the laboratory with the same type of respirator. The suitability of different respirators in practical work situations was then evaluated, as were the physical qualifications required of the wearer.
对21名从事建筑、铸造、造船和金属行业的工人以及9名消防员进行了研究,他们的工作需要经常使用各种工业呼吸器。在1至2个工作日或特殊任务期间,持续记录受试者的心率(HR)。在主要工作阶段测量他们的耗氧量(VO2)和通气率。通过次极量自行车测力计测试确定受试者的最大摄氧量(VO2max)。在建筑和工业工作中,当佩戴过滤装置或空气管路设备时,受试者的平均心率值范围为66至132次/分钟,这相当于最大摄氧量的12%至57%的相对有氧应激。在使用自给式呼吸器和防护服进行烟雾潜水以及维修和救援任务时,相应的平均值分别为142至160次/分钟和54%至74%VO2。将现场结果与在实验室使用相同类型呼吸器测得的结果进行比较。然后评估了不同呼吸器在实际工作情况下的适用性以及佩戴者所需的身体条件。