Rosén L A, O'Leary S G, Joyce S A, Conway G, Pfiffner L J
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1984 Dec;12(4):581-604. doi: 10.1007/BF00916852.
Teachers use both positive and negative consequences to influence classroom behaviors. Four experiments were conducted to examine the differential affects of these two types of consequences on the maintenance of appropriate behaviors of hyperactive children. Results of Experiment 1 showed that the use of both positive and negative consequences (combined) was associated with high levels of on-task behaviors. Withdrawal of negative consequences caused a significant and dramatic decrease in on-task performance. The withdrawal of positive consequences produced no change in the rate of on-task behaviors. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, the on-task results of Experiment 1 were replicated using a different teacher, different children, a counterbalanced design, longer phases, and different types of negative consequences. The withdrawal of negative consequences led to decreases in productivity in Experiment 2. The results of Experiment 3 also suggested that a prudent (e.g., calm, concrete, and consistent) approach to discipline was more effective than an imprudent (e.g., loud, emotional, and inconsistent) approach. Some level of mild negative consequences for inappropriate behavior is an important ingredient in effective classroom management, and qualitatively different negative consequences may have drastically different effects on the behavior of hyperactive students.
教师运用积极和消极后果来影响课堂行为。进行了四项实验,以检验这两种后果对多动儿童适当行为维持的不同影响。实验1的结果表明,同时使用积极和消极后果(结合使用)与高水平的专注行为相关。撤销消极后果会导致专注表现显著且急剧下降。撤销积极后果则使专注行为的速率没有变化。在实验2、3和4中,使用不同的教师、不同的儿童、平衡设计、更长的阶段以及不同类型的消极后果,重复了实验1中关于专注行为的结果。在实验2中,撤销消极后果导致生产率下降。实验3的结果还表明,谨慎(如冷静、具体且一致)的纪律方式比不谨慎(如大声、情绪化且不一致)的方式更有效。对不当行为施加一定程度的轻度消极后果是有效课堂管理的重要因素,而且性质不同的消极后果可能对多动学生的行为产生截然不同的影响。