• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

18岁时对通过产钳和真空吸引出生的男孩进行检查。

Boys born by forceps and vacuum extraction examined at 18 years of age.

作者信息

Nilsen S T

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1984;63(6):549-54. doi: 10.3109/00016348409156718.

DOI:10.3109/00016348409156718
PMID:6507056
Abstract

An 18-year follow-up study was made of 62 males delivered by forceps and 38 by vacuum extraction in 1962-63. The obstetrical data are compared with the medical and psychological military draft board examinations. The mortality and morbidity rates were not significantly different from those of the total cohort of Norwegian conscripts, either in the forceps or in the vacuum group. Rotation of the fetal head with Kielland's forceps in midcavity extractions did not adversely affect the late results. A significantly elevated mean intelligence score was found in the forceps group, while the vacuum group did not differ from the national average.

摘要

对1962年至1963年间通过产钳分娩的62名男性和通过真空吸引分娩的38名男性进行了一项为期18年的随访研究。将产科数据与医学和心理征兵委员会的检查结果进行了比较。产钳组和真空吸引组的死亡率和发病率与挪威应征入伍者的总队列相比均无显著差异。在中骨盆牵引时使用基兰德产钳旋转胎头对后期结果没有不利影响。产钳组的平均智力得分显著升高,而真空吸引组与全国平均水平没有差异。

相似文献

1
Boys born by forceps and vacuum extraction examined at 18 years of age.18岁时对通过产钳和真空吸引出生的男孩进行检查。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1984;63(6):549-54. doi: 10.3109/00016348409156718.
2
Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.基兰德产钳与负压吸引器的比较
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 May;95(5):483-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb12801.x.
3
Long-term effects of vacuum and forceps deliveries.
Lancet. 1991 Jun 29;337(8757):1583-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93273-c.
4
Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?基兰德产钳助产术:它会成为一门逐渐失传的技艺吗?
Singapore Med J. 1992 Aug;33(4):380-2.
5
A comparison of different methods of instrumental delivery based on electronic measurements of compression and traction.基于压缩和牵引电子测量的不同器械助产方法的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Sep;54(3):299-309.
6
Comparison of the use of the silastic obstetric vacuum extractor to Kielland's forceps.硅橡胶产科真空吸引器与基兰德产钳使用情况的比较。
Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;12(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1986.tb00162.x.
7
FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF CHILDREN DELIVERED BY VACUUM-EXTRACTION AND BY FORCEPS.真空吸引和产钳助产分娩儿童的随访研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1965;43:SUPPL 7:31-2. doi: 10.3109/00016346409155819.
8
Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.产钳或真空吸引术:母婴发病率比较
East Mediterr Health J. 2001 Jan-Mar;7(1-2):106-14.
9
Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):338-42.
10
Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared.胎儿旋转分娩:基兰德产钳与其他两种方法的比较。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Jul;89(7):501-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03648.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in children born after vacuum-assisted delivery compared with second-stage caesarean delivery and spontaneous vaginal delivery: a cohort study.与第二产程剖宫产和自然阴道分娩相比,负压吸引助产分娩的儿童的长期神经发育结局:一项队列研究。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Oct;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002048.