Suppr超能文献

直肠创伤的处理

Management of rectal trauma.

作者信息

Tuggle D, Huber P J

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1984 Dec;148(6):806-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90442-2.

Abstract

A 9 year review of rectal trauma was conducted. Forty-seven patients had major rectal trauma requiring diversion. Twenty-seven percent of patients presented in shock. Routine perioperative antibiotics were administered. Ninety-five percent of patients had positive findings on digital rectal examination or proctoscopy. There were 91 associated injuries. Rectal injuries were repaired in 19 patients. The absence of repair had no influence on postoperative morbidity or length of hospital stay. Ninety-five percent of patients had presacral drainage. One patient had distal rectal irrigation. Both loop and divided colostomies were utilized with no difference in morbidity or hospital stay. There were no deaths. Proctoscopy is essential in patients with wounds in proximity to the rectum. Diversion and presacral drainage for rectal injury is associated with a low mortality and acceptable morbidity. Rectal washout does not appear to be essential in civilian rectal injuries.

摘要

对直肠创伤进行了为期9年的回顾性研究。47例患者发生严重直肠创伤,需要进行转流手术。27%的患者就诊时处于休克状态。围手术期常规使用抗生素。95%的患者直肠指检或直肠镜检查有阳性发现。共有91处合并伤。19例患者进行了直肠损伤修复。未进行修复对术后发病率或住院时间无影响。95%的患者进行了骶前引流。1例患者进行了直肠远端冲洗。采用袢式结肠造口术和分开式结肠造口术,发病率和住院时间无差异。无死亡病例。对于直肠附近有伤口的患者,直肠镜检查至关重要。直肠损伤的转流手术和骶前引流死亡率低,发病率可接受。在平民直肠损伤中,直肠冲洗似乎并非必不可少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验