Claude J, Eilber U, Chow K W, Frentzel-Beyme R
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1984;54(4):335-43. doi: 10.1007/BF00378587.
In countries where death certificates are inaccessible for various reasons, cause of death statements made by relatives may gain greater importance. The validity of the cause of death of a deceased family member as stated by relatives compared to the underlying cause as stated on the death certificate has been examined in 310 cases. The sensitivity and the rate of confirmation are highest for neoplasms (both 89.6%). For cardiovascular diseases, the sensitivity (70%) is lower than the rate of confirmation (90%), indicating a certain amount of underreporting. The sensitivity is found to be lowest (50%) for diseases of the respiratory system. Violent deaths, on the other hand, were detected in 93.7%, although confirmed for only 75%. Closer relatives were able to report the cause of death more accurately. The time elapsed since the death of the family member, however, did not affect the recall of the relative. The concrete additional information from relatives, especially for cancer cases, is recommended in the absence of other data sources.
在因各种原因无法获取死亡证明的国家,亲属提供的死因声明可能会变得更加重要。在310例病例中,对亲属陈述的已故家庭成员死因与死亡证明上陈述的根本死因的有效性进行了检查。肿瘤的敏感性和确认率最高(均为89.6%)。对于心血管疾病,敏感性(70%)低于确认率(90%),表明存在一定程度的漏报。发现呼吸系统疾病的敏感性最低(50%)。另一方面,暴力死亡的检出率为93.7%,但确认率仅为75%。近亲能够更准确地报告死因。然而,家庭成员死亡后的时间间隔并未影响亲属的回忆。在没有其他数据来源的情况下,建议采用亲属提供的具体补充信息,尤其是癌症病例。