• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成年期元记忆的结构与发展

Structure and development of metamemory in adulthood.

作者信息

Dixon R A, Hultsch D F

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1983 Nov;38(6):682-8. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.6.682.

DOI:10.1093/geronj/38.6.682
PMID:6630902
Abstract

A multiple factor instrument was designed to represent a multidimensional construct of metamemory. Eight theoretically meaningful dimensions were defined: (a) Use of memory strategies (Strategy); (b) Knowledge of memory tasks (Task); (c) Knowledge of own memory capacities (Capacity); (d) Attitudes toward own memory: Perception of change (Change); (e) Activities supportive of memory (Activity); (f) Memory and state anxiety (Anxiety); (g) Memory and achievement motivation (Achievement); and (h) Locus of control in memory abilities (Locus). After content validity was established for a pool of items, the instrument was administered sequentially to three separate samples of adults. Computation of internal consistency estimates (by age and sample) and factorial validity (by sample) resulted in a 120-item instrument. Multivariate analyses of variance revealed robust significant age differences on the Task. Capacity, Change, and Locus subscales, with young adults evincing higher levels of knowledge regarding the first three of these dimensions, and more internality on the fourth, than older adults.

摘要

设计了一种多因素工具来代表元记忆的多维结构。定义了八个具有理论意义的维度:(a) 记忆策略的使用(策略);(b) 对记忆任务的了解(任务);(c) 对自身记忆能力的了解(能力);(d) 对自身记忆的态度:对变化的感知(变化);(e) 支持记忆的活动(活动);(f) 记忆与状态焦虑(焦虑);(g) 记忆与成就动机(成就);以及 (h) 记忆能力的控制点(控制点)。在确定了一组项目的内容效度后,该工具依次施用于三个不同的成人样本。通过计算内部一致性估计值(按年龄和样本)和因子效度(按样本),得到了一个由120个项目组成的工具。多变量方差分析显示,在任务、能力、变化和控制点分量表上存在显著的年龄差异,与老年人相比,年轻人在这些维度中的前三个维度上表现出更高的知识水平,在第四个维度上表现出更强的内控性。

相似文献

1
Structure and development of metamemory in adulthood.成年期元记忆的结构与发展
J Gerontol. 1983 Nov;38(6):682-8. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.6.682.
2
Effects of depressive symptoms and routinization on metamemory during adulthood.抑郁症状和常规化对成年期内内省记忆的影响。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
3
Metamemory and memory for text relationships in adulthood: a cross-validation study.成年期的元记忆与文本关系记忆:一项交叉验证研究。
J Gerontol. 1983 Nov;38(6):689-94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/38.6.689.
4
On the differentiation of memory beliefs from memory knowledge: the factor structure of the Metamemory in Adulthood Scale.论记忆信念与记忆知识的区分:成人期元记忆量表的因素结构
Exp Aging Res. 1987 Spring-Summer;13(1-2):101-7. doi: 10.1080/03610738708259308.
5
Predictors of metamemory in older adults.老年人元记忆的预测因素。
Nurs Res. 1994 Jul-Aug;43(4):212-8.
6
Self-evaluation of memory systems: development of the questionnaire.记忆系统自评:问卷的编制。
Aging Ment Health. 2011 Sep;15(7):830-7. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.569483. Epub 2011 May 23.
7
Age differences in components of metamemory.
Exp Aging Res. 1990 Spring-Summer;16(1-2):43-8. doi: 10.1080/03610739008253873.
8
Optimizing memory strategy use in young and older adults: The role of metamemory and internal strategy use.优化年轻人和老年人的记忆策略使用:元记忆和内部策略使用的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
Age, cohort, and period effects on metamemory beliefs.年龄、队列和时期效应对元记忆信念的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Dec;34(8):1077-1089. doi: 10.1037/pag0000384.
10
Metamemory knowledge and beliefs in patients with schizophrenia and how these relate to objective cognitive abilities.精神分裂症患者的元记忆知识和信念,以及这些知识和信念与客观认知能力的关系。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.017. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The psychometric properties and applicability of subjective cognitive measures used in menopause research: a systematic review.更年期研究中使用的主观认知测量方法的心理测量特性及适用性:一项系统综述。
Menopause. 2025 Apr 1;32(4):361-379. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002494.
2
EngAge - A metacognitive intervention to supplement working memory training: A feasibility study in older adults.EngAge——一种补充工作记忆训练的元认知干预措施:针对老年人的可行性研究。
Aging Brain. 2023 Jul 7;4:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.nbas.2023.100083. eCollection 2023.
3
Personality traits moderate associations between word recall and subjective memory.
人格特质调节词汇召回与主观记忆之间的关联。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2024 Jul;31(4):705-722. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2023.2249195. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
The role of individual features of memory and impulsiveness in telling a true or false story in a realistic, clear, and reconstructible way.记忆和冲动的个体特征在以现实、清晰且可重构的方式讲述真实或虚假故事中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1173219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173219. eCollection 2023.
5
Subjective memory measures: Metamemory questionnaires currently in use.主观记忆测量:目前使用的元记忆问卷。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):924-942. doi: 10.1177/17470218231183855. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
6
Real-world compensatory strategy use in community-dwelling mid-life and older adults: An evaluation of quality.社区居住的中老年人群现实世界补偿策略的使用:对其质量的评估。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb;38(2):429-452. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2023.2209927. Epub 2023 May 11.
7
Suitability of memory aids and strategies for people with posterior cortical atrophy: protocol for a scoping review.后部皮质萎缩症患者的记忆辅助工具和策略的适用性:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;12(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02187-4.
8
Metacognitive Scales: Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge in Older Adults Using Everyday Life Scenarios.元认知量表:运用日常生活场景评估老年人的元认知知识
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 5;12(10):2410. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102410.
9
Memory Perfectionism is Associated with Persistent Memory Complaints after Concussion.记忆完美主义与脑震荡后持续的记忆抱怨有关。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Aug 23;37(6):1177-1184. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac021.
10
Troubled past: A critical psychometric assessment of the self-report Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM).多灾多难的过去:自传体记忆量表(SAM)自我报告的关键心理计量评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):261-286. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01604-7. Epub 2021 Jun 22.