Müller K H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1978 May 30;91(3):201-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00379752.
The treatment of the destructive, unstable state of infection on the hip often takes an unfavourable course, because alloarthroplastic techniques are ruled out on principle, while the hip arthrodesis itself creates biomechanical problems under the incomparably more favourable aseptic conditions. The protracted trimming arthrodesis with immobilisation by pelvic plaster cast remains precarious with regard to the painful stress and the sedation of the infection, and it always includes the danger a damage causing immobilisation of the knee joint. The jointparts destructed by the infection are equivalent to an infected pseudarthrosis; for its stabilisation the fixateur externe is indicated, by analogy to the approach used on the extremities. The biomechanical problems are similar to those occuring with the internal fixation of hip arthrodesis: neutralisation of dislodging forces on the long leg lever, reliable anchorage of the means of osteosynthesis on the pelvis and axial compression on the broadest possible contact surfaces of the anthrodesis. A special installation of the fixateur externe (tubular system of the ASIF) is pointed out, which meets almost all requirements. The external osteosynthesis joins lateral ilium and femur shaft, compressing the hip area. For securing the stability it is necessary to include both of the iliac crests and a diagonal brace in the outer construction. The external fixation for stabilising the hip represents a large-scale technique which, by its nature, is inferior to internal osteosynthesis. But for the treatment of active pyogenic coxitis neither the arthrodesis by copra-head-plate nor the screw joint in connection with intertrochanteric osteotomy is suited. The advantages in contrast to the classical therapy with pelvic plaster cast are obvious. The operating method is explained on a model and presented in a casuistry on 3 people operated on so far. If the head-neck-segment is lost completely after septic head necrosis, a careful debridement and the Girdlestone-plastic usually lead to an infection sanitation, but mostly at the cost of an unstable hip on the considerably shortened leg.
髋关节感染所致的破坏性、不稳定状态的治疗往往过程不利,因为原则上排除了同种关节置换技术,而髋关节融合术本身在无菌条件相对更有利的情况下也会产生生物力学问题。采用骨盆石膏固定的长期修整性关节融合术在疼痛应激和感染的控制方面仍不稳定,且始终存在导致膝关节固定性损伤的风险。受感染破坏的关节部位等同于感染性假关节;为使其稳定,可采用外固定架,这与用于四肢的方法类似。其生物力学问题与髋关节融合术的内固定所出现的问题相似:抵消长腿杠杆上的移位力、将骨合成装置可靠地固定在骨盆上以及在关节融合的尽可能宽的接触面上进行轴向加压。文中指出了一种特殊的外固定架装置(ASIF管状系统),它几乎满足所有要求。外骨固定术连接髂骨外侧和股骨干,对髋关节区域进行加压。为确保稳定性,有必要在外部结构中纳入双侧髂嵴和一个斜撑。用于稳定髋关节的外固定是一项大型技术,就其本质而言,不如内骨固定术。但对于活动性化脓性髋关节炎的治疗,无论是用椰头钢板进行关节融合术还是结合转子间截骨术的螺钉关节都不合适。与传统的骨盆石膏固定疗法相比,其优势显而易见。文中通过模型解释了手术方法,并在迄今接受手术的3例病例中进行了病例分析。如果在感染性股骨头坏死后头颈部完全缺失,仔细清创和吉德斯顿整形术通常可实现感染控制,但大多是以髋关节不稳定和腿部明显缩短为代价。