Riesman P
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1983 Jun;7(2):103-29. doi: 10.1007/BF00051845.
Using data gathered during nearly four years of field work among the Fulbe of Upper Volta and their ex-slaves the Riimaaybe, the author argues that the major differences between the dominant personality types of these two groups cannot be due to child rearing practices because those practices are identical. He then accounts for the differences by taking personality to the portrayal of one's sense of self and the latter to derive chiefly from perception of one's location in the social structure. The implications of this analysis are drawn upon to elucidate the reasons why it is so widely believed that parental practices are of crucial importance to character formation.
作者利用在沃尔特河上游地区的富尔贝人及其前奴隶里马阿贝人中进行的近四年实地调查所收集的数据,认为这两个群体主导性格类型的主要差异不可能归因于育儿方式,因为这些方式是相同的。然后,他通过将性格归因于一个人的自我意识的描绘,而后者主要源于对自己在社会结构中位置的感知,来解释这些差异。利用这一分析的含义来阐明为什么人们普遍认为父母的做法对性格形成至关重要。