Olson R K, Davidson B J, Kliegl R, Davies S E
J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Feb;37(1):187-206. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90066-3.
The development of phonetic codes in memory of 141 pairs of normal and disabled readers from 7.8 to 16.8 years of age was tested with a task adapted from L. S. Mark, D. Shankweiler, I. Y. Liberman, and C. A. Fowler (Memory & Cognition, 1977, 5, 623-629) that measured false-positive errors in recognition memory for foil words which rhymed with words in the memory list versus foil words that did not rhyme. Our younger subjects replicated Mark et al., showing a larger difference between rhyming and nonrhyming false-positive errors for the normal readers. The older disabled readers' phonetic effect was comparable to that of the younger normal readers, suggesting a developmental lag in their use of phonetic coding in memory. Surprisingly, the normal readers' phonetic effect declined with age in the recognition task, but they maintained a significant advantage across age in the auditory WISC-R digit span recall test, and a test of phonological nonword decoding. The normals' decline with age in rhyming confusion may be due to an increase in the precision of their phonetic codes.
通过一项改编自L. S. 马克、D. 尚克维勒、I. Y. 利伯曼和C. A. 福勒(《记忆与认知》,1977年,第5卷,第623 - 629页)的任务,对141对年龄在7.8岁至16.8岁之间的正常读者和阅读障碍读者的语音编码发展进行了测试。该任务测量了对与记忆列表中的单词押韵的陪衬词和不押韵的陪衬词的识别记忆中的误报错误。我们较年轻的受试者重复了马克等人的研究结果,正常读者在押韵和不押韵的误报错误之间表现出更大的差异。年龄较大的阅读障碍读者的语音效应与较年轻的正常读者相当,这表明他们在记忆中使用语音编码存在发育滞后。令人惊讶的是,正常读者在识别任务中的语音效应随年龄下降,但他们在听觉韦氏儿童智力量表修订版数字广度回忆测试和语音非词解码测试中在各年龄段都保持着显著优势。正常读者在押韵混淆方面随年龄的下降可能是由于他们语音编码精度的提高。