Hoeppner T, Lolas F
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Jun;41(6):493-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.6.493.
Absolute latency, interocular difference in latency, and waveform of visual evoked responses (VER) to checkerboard reversal stimuli recorded from the midline of the skull were studied in 104 multiple sclerosis patients, 25 to 50 years of age, classified according to visual symptomatology. Group 1 had strong evidence of past or present optic neuritis. Patients with blurring of vision, diplopia, and undefined visual complaints were assigned to group 2, while group 3 contained patients with no visual symptoms but suspected diagnosis of multiple sclerosis on other grounds. The three parameters explored showed consistent association with the degree of visual involvement, as assessed by clinical impression, but their discriminatory power was diverse. Absolute latency was significantly longer in group 1 patients compared with groups 2 and 3, but it did not discriminate between the last two, whereas interocular difference in latency proved to be sensitive to differences between symptomatic (diplopia, blurring) and asymptomatic groups (2 and 3). Waveshapes were grouped into three categories based upon degree of distortion of the major positive peak, and their relative distribution among the three patient groups was found to be associated with symptomatology. We suggest that, in the production of symptoms such as diplopia, a temporal disparity of afferent impulses might be involved in much the same way that spatial incongruities between both eyes lead to impaired function. In this regard, interocular difference in latency rather than absolute latency would be a more accurate predictor of symptom development. The analysis of VER waveshape suggests, in addition, the importance of inhomogeneous involvement of the visual pathways in the production of symptoms during the evolution of multiple sclerosis.
对104名年龄在25至50岁之间、根据视觉症状分类的多发性硬化症患者,研究了从颅骨中线记录的对棋盘格反转刺激的视觉诱发电位(VER)的绝对潜伏期、两眼间潜伏期差异和波形。第1组有过去或现在视神经炎的有力证据。视力模糊、复视和未明确视觉主诉的患者被归入第2组,而第3组包含无视觉症状但基于其他原因疑似多发性硬化症诊断的患者。所探究的这三个参数与临床印象评估的视觉受累程度呈现出一致的关联,但它们的鉴别能力各不相同。与第2组和第3组相比,第1组患者的绝对潜伏期明显更长,但它无法区分后两组,而两眼间潜伏期差异被证明对有症状(复视、模糊)和无症状组(第2组和第3组)之间的差异敏感。波形根据主要正峰的失真程度分为三类,发现它们在三组患者中的相对分布与症状学相关。我们认为,在产生复视等症状时,传入冲动的时间差异可能以与双眼间空间不一致导致功能受损大致相同的方式参与其中。在这方面,两眼间潜伏期差异而非绝对潜伏期将是症状发展更准确的预测指标。此外,VER波形分析表明,在多发性硬化症演变过程中,视觉通路的不均匀受累在症状产生中具有重要性。