Cook A, Levine B A, Rusing T, Sirinek K R, Gaskill H V
Arch Surg. 1984 May;119(5):591-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390170087017.
Several recent reports have described management of penetrating colon wounds with primary closure, exteriorization, and early return to the abdominal cavity. Since this procedure was not the technique practiced at our institution, we reviewed our five-year experience with 207 patients with such wounds to determine whether a change in methods was warranted. The patients, predominantly young and male, were often victims of gunshots or stabbings. Associated injuries (intra-abdominal, 64%; extra-abdominal, 35%) were frequent. Overall mortality was 4% and included three patients who died within 24 hours of admission. Morbidity was 43%, including 17% related to colon injury. All documented colostomy closures were without mortality. We concluded that management of penetrating colon injuries by traditional methods yields low morbidity and mortality. A comparison of our results with those obtained using alternative techniques convinced us that the continued use of traditional methods in treating colon trauma is warranted.
最近的几份报告描述了穿透性结肠伤口的处理方法,包括一期缝合、外置和早期回纳入腹腔。由于该方法并非我们机构所采用的技术,我们回顾了207例此类伤口患者的五年治疗经验,以确定是否有必要改变治疗方法。患者以年轻人和男性为主,多为枪击或刺伤的受害者。常伴有其他损伤(腹腔内损伤占64%;腹腔外损伤占35%)。总体死亡率为4%,其中包括3例入院后24小时内死亡的患者。发病率为43%,其中17%与结肠损伤有关。所有记录在案的结肠造口关闭均无死亡病例。我们得出结论,采用传统方法处理穿透性结肠损伤的发病率和死亡率较低。将我们的结果与采用其他技术获得的结果进行比较后,我们确信在治疗结肠创伤时继续使用传统方法是合理的。