George S M, Fabian T C, Voeller G R, Kudsk K A, Mangiante E C, Britt L G
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.
Ann Surg. 1989 Jun;209(6):728-33; 733-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198906000-00010.
102 patients with penetrating intraperitoneal colon injuries were entered into a prospective study. Colon wound management was undertaken without regard to associated injuries or amount of fecal contamination. Primary repair was performed in 83 patients, segmental resection with anastomosis in 12, and resection with end colostomy in 7. There were no suture line failures in the primary repair group, and one suture line failure in the anastomosis group. The one failure was in a patient who underwent repeated explorations for bleeding before the leak occurred. The septic complication rate was 33% of the entire series and was unrelated to primary repair. Logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for sepsis included transfusion greater than or equal to 4 units (p less than 0.02), more than two associated injuries (p less than 0.04), significant contamination (p less than 0.05), and increasing colon injury severity scores (p less than 0.02). The method of colon wound management, location and mode of injury, presence of hypotension (BP less than 90), and age did not significantly contribute to sepsis. We conclude that nearly all penetrating colon wounds can be repaired primarily or with resection and anastomosis, regardless of risk factors.
102例结肠穿透性腹腔损伤患者纳入前瞻性研究。结肠伤口处理未考虑合并伤或粪便污染程度。83例患者进行了一期修复,12例进行了节段性切除并吻合,7例进行了切除并结肠造口术。一期修复组无吻合口漏,吻合组有1例吻合口漏。该例失败发生在漏出前因出血反复探查的患者。整个系列的感染并发症发生率为33%,与一期修复无关。用于确定感染危险因素的逻辑回归分析包括输注≥4单位(p<0.02)、合并伤超过两处(p<0.04)、严重污染(p<0.05)以及结肠损伤严重程度评分增加(p<0.02)。结肠伤口处理方法、损伤部位和方式、低血压(血压<90)的存在以及年龄对感染无显著影响。我们得出结论,几乎所有穿透性结肠伤口均可一期修复或行切除吻合术,而无需考虑危险因素。