Suppr超能文献

结肠伤口的一期修复。一项针对未筛选患者的前瞻性试验。

Primary repair of colon wounds. A prospective trial in nonselected patients.

作者信息

George S M, Fabian T C, Voeller G R, Kudsk K A, Mangiante E C, Britt L G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1989 Jun;209(6):728-33; 733-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198906000-00010.

Abstract

102 patients with penetrating intraperitoneal colon injuries were entered into a prospective study. Colon wound management was undertaken without regard to associated injuries or amount of fecal contamination. Primary repair was performed in 83 patients, segmental resection with anastomosis in 12, and resection with end colostomy in 7. There were no suture line failures in the primary repair group, and one suture line failure in the anastomosis group. The one failure was in a patient who underwent repeated explorations for bleeding before the leak occurred. The septic complication rate was 33% of the entire series and was unrelated to primary repair. Logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for sepsis included transfusion greater than or equal to 4 units (p less than 0.02), more than two associated injuries (p less than 0.04), significant contamination (p less than 0.05), and increasing colon injury severity scores (p less than 0.02). The method of colon wound management, location and mode of injury, presence of hypotension (BP less than 90), and age did not significantly contribute to sepsis. We conclude that nearly all penetrating colon wounds can be repaired primarily or with resection and anastomosis, regardless of risk factors.

摘要

102例结肠穿透性腹腔损伤患者纳入前瞻性研究。结肠伤口处理未考虑合并伤或粪便污染程度。83例患者进行了一期修复,12例进行了节段性切除并吻合,7例进行了切除并结肠造口术。一期修复组无吻合口漏,吻合组有1例吻合口漏。该例失败发生在漏出前因出血反复探查的患者。整个系列的感染并发症发生率为33%,与一期修复无关。用于确定感染危险因素的逻辑回归分析包括输注≥4单位(p<0.02)、合并伤超过两处(p<0.04)、严重污染(p<0.05)以及结肠损伤严重程度评分增加(p<0.02)。结肠伤口处理方法、损伤部位和方式、低血压(血压<90)的存在以及年龄对感染无显著影响。我们得出结论,几乎所有穿透性结肠伤口均可一期修复或行切除吻合术,而无需考虑危险因素。

相似文献

7
A ten-year study of penetrating injuries of the colon.一项关于结肠穿透伤的十年研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2169-77. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0726-5.
9
Colon trauma: further support for primary repair.结肠创伤:对一期修复的进一步支持
Am J Surg. 1988 Jul;156(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80161-2.

引用本文的文献

5
Rectal foreign body causing perforation: Case report and literature review.直肠异物致穿孔:病例报告及文献综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Oct 11;47:66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.10.005. eCollection 2019 Nov.
6
Evolution of the operative management of colon trauma.结肠创伤手术治疗的演变
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jul 31;2(1):e000092. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000092. eCollection 2017.
7
Colon Trauma: Evidence-Based Practices.结肠创伤:循证实践
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018 Jan;31(1):11-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1602175. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
9
Treatment of Casualties in a Forward Hospital of Indian Army : Nine year Experience.印度军队前方医院伤员的治疗:九年经验
Med J Armed Forces India. 2004 Jan;60(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(04)80151-5. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
10
Independent Predictors of Treatment Modality for Penetrating Colon Injury.穿透性结肠损伤治疗方式的独立预测因素
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Aug;35(4):378. doi: 10.1007/s00068-008-8116-7. Epub 2008 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Comparison of penetrating injuries of the right and left colon.左右结肠穿透伤的比较
Ann Surg. 1981 Apr;193(4):414-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198104000-00004.
6
Penetrating colon trauma.穿透性结肠创伤。
J Trauma. 1984 Jun;24(6):491-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198406000-00006.
10
Management of the injured colon.受伤结肠的处理
Curr Surg. 1986 May-Jun;43(3):190-3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验