Ames R G, Trent B
Br J Ind Med. 1984 May;41(2):197-202. doi: 10.1136/oem.41.2.197.
Workers who are particularly susceptible to the effects of their occupational exposure, from the perspective of the healthy worker effect, soon leave the workplace. The result of this mobility, called survival bias, is that cross sectional studies based on the survivors underestimate the true risk of occupational exposures. Two questions are addressed in this empirical study of the "survival bias" component of the "healthy worker" effect. Do miners with respiratory impairment or symptoms disproportionately leave jobs that have a potentially harmful respiratory exposure? And does the presence of an additional potentially harmful respiratory exposure, in this case diesel emissions, accelerate the rate of mobility for miners with respiratory impairment or symptoms? No confirmation was found for the survival effect in a study of 738 diesel and 420 non-diesel US underground coal miners. No additional increment in mobility was associated with exposure to both coal mine dust and diesel emissions.
从健康工人效应的角度来看,那些特别容易受到职业暴露影响的工人很快就会离开工作场所。这种流动性的结果,即生存偏差,是基于幸存者的横断面研究低估了职业暴露的真实风险。本实证研究针对“健康工人”效应中的“生存偏差”部分探讨了两个问题。有呼吸功能损害或症状的矿工是否会不成比例地离开存在潜在有害呼吸暴露的工作岗位?以及额外存在一种潜在有害的呼吸暴露,在这种情况下是柴油排放,是否会加速有呼吸功能损害或症状的矿工的流动速度?在一项对738名接触柴油的美国地下煤矿工人和420名不接触柴油的美国地下煤矿工人的研究中,未发现生存效应的证据。接触煤矿粉尘和柴油排放并未导致流动率进一步增加。