Abravanel E, Sigafoos A D
Child Dev. 1984 Apr;55(2):381-92.
2 investigations of early imitative ability were conducted with cross-sectional samples of infants between 4 and 21 weeks. Study 1 involved 2 rounds of modeling 5 gestures to infants. In Study 2, the number of modeled gestures was reduced to 3, but each one was modeled many more times--for the duration of the infant's attention over a 3-min period. When frequencies of reproduction of a modeled act were compared against baseline frequencies and against average frequencies of the act during periods when other actions were modeled, several main results were obtained. First, the most general finding was that imitative-like matching of modeled gestures was the exception, not the rule, at all ages. Second, even where significantly greater frequencies of a gesture occurred during modeling than during control periods, it was always a partial and incomplete version of the modeled act that was reproduced, not a well-formed copy of the adult's gesture. Finally, where results were consistent with an interpretation of imitation, as with responses to tongue protrusion modeling, the effect was restricted to the youngest ages: 4-6 weeks. Given the restricted evidence for imitation, and the fact that neither linear nor curvilinear growth trends were apparent, the most appropriate explanation for the reproduction of tongue protrusions at the youngest age is to be sought in terms of a reflexive or fixed action pattern type of response.
针对4至21周大的婴儿横断面样本进行了两项早期模仿能力的研究。研究1包括向婴儿示范5种手势的两轮操作。在研究2中,示范手势的数量减少到3种,但每种手势的示范次数更多——在婴儿3分钟的注意力持续时间内。当将示范动作的再现频率与基线频率以及在示范其他动作期间该动作的平均频率进行比较时,得出了几个主要结果。首先,最普遍的发现是,在所有年龄段,模仿式地匹配示范手势都是例外,而非普遍现象。其次,即使在示范期间某种手势出现的频率明显高于对照期,所再现的也总是示范动作的部分且不完整版本,而非成人手势的完整复制品。最后,在结果与模仿解释一致的情况下,比如对伸舌示范的反应,这种效应仅限于最年幼的年龄段:4至6周。鉴于模仿的证据有限,且线性和曲线增长趋势均不明显,对于最年幼年龄段伸舌行为的再现,最恰当的解释应从反射性或固定动作模式类型的反应方面去寻找。