• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常社会解释的文化与发展

Culture and development of everyday social explanation.

作者信息

Miller J G

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 May;46(5):961-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.5.961.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.46.5.961
PMID:6737211
Abstract

The impact of cultural meaning systems on the development of everyday social explanation is explored in a cross-cultural investigation undertaken among Indian and American adults and children (ages 8, 11, and 15 year). It is demonstrated that at older ages Americans make greater reference to general dispositions and less reference to contextual factors in explanation than do Hindus . References to general dispositions also undergo a much greater developmental increase among Americans than among Hindus , whereas references to contextual factors show the opposite pattern of developmental change. Evidence suggests that these cross-cultural and developmental differences result from contrasting cultural conceptions of the person acquired over development in the two cultures rather than from cognitive., experiential, or informational differences between attributors . Discussion focuses on theoretical implications of such a demonstration for understanding: (a) the importance of integrating semantic with structural considerations in theories of social attribution, (b) the need to develop nonteleological frameworks for interpreting age and cultural diversity in conceptualization, and (c) the role of cultural communication in the acquisition of everyday social knowledge.

摘要

在一项针对印度和美国成年人及儿童(8岁、11岁和15岁)的跨文化调查中,探讨了文化意义系统对日常社会解释发展的影响。结果表明,在年龄较大时,与印度教徒相比,美国人在解释中更多地提及一般性格特征,而较少提及情境因素。与印度教徒相比,美国人对一般性格特征的提及在发展过程中的增加幅度也大得多,而对情境因素的提及则呈现出相反的发展变化模式。有证据表明,这些跨文化和发展差异源于两种文化在发展过程中所形成的关于人的不同文化观念,而非归因者之间的认知、经验或信息差异。讨论集中在这种论证对于理解以下方面的理论意义:(a)在社会归因理论中整合语义与结构考量的重要性;(b)为解释概念化中的年龄和文化多样性而发展非目的论框架的必要性;(c)文化交流在日常社会知识获取中的作用。

相似文献

1
Culture and development of everyday social explanation.日常社会解释的文化与发展
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 May;46(5):961-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.5.961.
2
Motivated cultural cognition: the impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):247-59. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.247.
3
Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: moral imperatives or personal decisions?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jan;58(1):33-47. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.1.33.
4
The influence of social context on the perception of assistive technology: using a semantic differential scale to compare young adults' views from the United Kingdom and Pakistan.社会环境对辅助技术认知的影响:使用语义差异量表比较来自英国和巴基斯坦的年轻人的观点。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Jul;15(5):563-576. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1646819. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
5
Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: a model of change.跨文化视角下的家庭与社会化:一种变化模式
Nebr Symp Motiv. 1989;37:135-200.
6
Perceptions of schizophrenia and coping styles in caregivers: comparison between India and Switzerland.照顾者对精神分裂症的认知及应对方式:印度与瑞士的比较
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;23(9-10):585-594. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12345.
7
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
8
Early social cognition in three cultural contexts.三种文化背景下的早期社会认知。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2011 Aug;76(2):vii-viii, 1-142. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2011.00603.x.
9
From American city to Japanese village: a cross-cultural investigation of implicit race attitudes.从美国城市到日本乡村:对隐性种族态度的跨文化调查
Child Dev. 2006 Sep-Oct;77(5):1268-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00933.x.
10
Do we overemphasize the role of culture in the behavior of racial/ethnic minorities? Evidence of a cultural (mis)attribution bias in American psychology.我们是否过分强调了文化在少数族裔行为中的作用?美国心理学中存在文化归因偏差的证据。
Am Psychol. 2018 Apr;73(3):243-255. doi: 10.1037/amp0000099. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural variations in perceptions and reactions to social norm transgressions: a comparative study.对社会规范违规行为的认知与反应中的文化差异:一项比较研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 20;14:1243955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1243955. eCollection 2023.
2
Do Surrounding People's Emotions Affect Judgment of the Central Person's Emotion? Comparing Within Cultural Variation in Holistic Patterns of Emotion Perception in the Multicultural Canadian Society.周围人的情绪会影响对中心人物情绪的判断吗?比较多元文化的加拿大社会中情绪感知整体模式的文化差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 5;16:886971. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.886971. eCollection 2022.
3
Spontaneous Trait Inferences From Behavior: A Systematic Meta-Analysis.
自发特质推断的行为研究:系统元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):78-102. doi: 10.1177/01461672221100336. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Self-Concept With Cross-Cultural Perspective: 36-72-Month-Old Preschool Children in Turkey and Germany.跨文化视角下的自我概念:土耳其和德国36至72个月大的学龄前儿童
Front Psychol. 2022 May 23;13:821074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.821074. eCollection 2022.
5
Attributions about Peer Victimization in US and Korean Adolescents and Associations with Internalizing Problems.美国和韩国青少年对同伴侵害的归因及其与内化问题的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Oct;51(10):2018-2032. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01622-4. Epub 2022 May 6.
6
Persuasive Features of Scientific Explanations: Explanatory Schemata of Physical and Psychosocial Phenomena.科学解释的说服性特征:物理和社会心理现象的解释图式
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 6;12:644809. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644809. eCollection 2021.
7
Cultural Similarities and Differences in the Development of Sociomoral Judgments: An Eye-Tracking Study.社会道德判断发展中的文化异同:一项眼动追踪研究。
Cogn Dev. 2021 Jan-Mar;57. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100974. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Culture and decision making.文化与决策
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2016 Sep;136:106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
9
A Cultural Perspective on Functional Limitations and Well-Being.关于功能限制与幸福的文化视角
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Sep;46(9):1378-1391. doi: 10.1177/0146167220905712. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
10
Cross-Cultural Examination of the False Consensus Effect.错误共识效应的跨文化考察
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 11;10:2747. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02747. eCollection 2019.