• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自发特质推断的行为研究:系统元分析。

Spontaneous Trait Inferences From Behavior: A Systematic Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Universität Hamburg, Germany.

Universität Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):78-102. doi: 10.1177/01461672221100336. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1177/01461672221100336
PMID:35751144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10676050/
Abstract

Research suggests that people spontaneously infer traits from behavioral information, thus forming impressions of actors' personalities. Such spontaneous trait inferences (STI) have been examined in a wide range of studies in the last four decades. Here, we provide the first systematic meta-analysis of this vast literature. We included data from = 86 publications, with overall = 13,630 participants. The average STI effect was moderate to large ( = 0.59) and showed substantial heterogeneity. The type of experimental paradigm significantly moderated the STI effect size, with larger effects in long-term memory-based paradigms compared with working memory-based paradigms. Generally, STI effects were robust to various methodological variations and also to potential concerns of publication bias. Contrary to expectations, cultural background (independent vs. interdependent) did not emerge as a significant moderator of STI effects. We discuss these findings with respect to their theoretical relevance and derive implications for future research and theorizing.

摘要

研究表明,人们会自发地从行为信息中推断出特征,从而对演员的个性形成印象。在过去的四十年中,人们在广泛的研究中对这种自发的特质推断(STI)进行了研究。在这里,我们对这一大量文献进行了首次系统的元分析。我们纳入了 86 篇文献的数据,共有 13630 名参与者。平均 STI 效应为中等至较大( = 0.59),且具有显著的异质性。实验范式的类型显著调节了 STI 效应大小,基于长期记忆的范式比基于工作记忆的范式的效应更大。一般来说,STI 效应在各种方法学变化和出版偏倚的潜在担忧下都是稳健的。与预期相反,文化背景(独立与相互依存)并没有成为 STI 效应的显著调节因素。我们将根据这些发现的理论相关性进行讨论,并为未来的研究和理论化提出启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/7c79b0f2d242/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/18e4b6189855/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/072c055d4a15/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/dfe0ac0e43d1/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/7c79b0f2d242/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/18e4b6189855/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/072c055d4a15/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/dfe0ac0e43d1/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23ae/10676050/7c79b0f2d242/10.1177_01461672221100336-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Spontaneous Trait Inferences From Behavior: A Systematic Meta-Analysis.自发特质推断的行为研究:系统元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):78-102. doi: 10.1177/01461672221100336. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Spontaneous Trait Inferences on Social Media.社交媒体上的自发特质推理
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Jan;8(1):93-101. doi: 10.1177/1948550616663803. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors' faces: evidence from a false recognition paradigm.自发特质推理与行为者的面孔相关联:来自错误识别范式的证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(5):1051-65.
5
Spontaneous state inferences.自发状态推断。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;121(4):774-791. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000232. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
6
EEG components of spontaneous trait inferences.自发特质推理的脑电图成分。
Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(2):164-77. doi: 10.1080/17470910801907226.
7
My general manager is warmer than department manager: Stereotypes about senior and junior high-power individuals and their influences on spontaneous trait inference.我的总经理比部门经理更热情:关于高层和低层高权力个体的刻板印象及其对自发特质推断的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1015736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015736. eCollection 2022.
8
The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences.自发特质推理中的人物指涉过程。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Oct;87(4):482-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.482.
9
The development of spontaneous trait inferences: evidence from Chinese children.自发特质推理的发展:来自中国儿童的证据。
Psychol Rep. 2013 Jun;112(3):887-99. doi: 10.2466/21.07.PR0.112.3.887-899.
10
Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from?面孔的第一印象源自何处?
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Inferences about women's traits influence the judgment of their eye contact.对女性特质的推断会影响对她们眼神交流的判断。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02704-7.
2
Visualizing threat and trustworthiness prior beliefs in face perception in high versus low paranoia.可视化高偏执与低偏执状态下对面部感知中威胁和可信度的先验信念。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Mar 20;10(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00459-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review.多水平模型(元分析)中应用多个随机效应:系统综述。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):2031-2052. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01373-9.
2
Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.检测标准化均数差的漏斗图不对称性。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):57-71. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1332. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
The Primacy-of-Warmth Effect on Spontaneous Trait Inferences and the Moderating Role of Trait Valence: Evidence From Chinese Undergraduates.
温暖优先效应在自发特质推理中的作用及特质效价的调节作用:来自中国大学生的证据
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2148. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02148. eCollection 2018.
4
Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies.极少量研究情况下的证据综合方法。
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Sep;9(3):382-392. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1297. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.心理学定量研究期刊文章报告标准:APA 出版与传播委员会工作组报告。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25. doi: 10.1037/amp0000191.
6
Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.评估元回归方法以检验与依存效应大小的调节关系:一项蒙特卡罗模拟。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):435-450. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1245. Epub 2017 May 28.
7
Spontaneous Trait Inferences on Social Media.社交媒体上的自发特质推理
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Jan;8(1):93-101. doi: 10.1177/1948550616663803. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
The development of spontaneous trait inferences about the actor and spontaneous trait transferences about the informant: Evidence from children aged 8-13 years.关于行为者的自发特质推理及关于信息提供者的自发特质转移的发展:来自8至13岁儿童的证据。
Int J Psychol. 2018 Aug;53(4):269-277. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12367. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
9
The effects of mood on spontaneous trait inferences about the actor: Evidence from Chinese undergraduates.情绪对关于行为者的自发特质推理的影响:来自中国大学生的证据。
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Jun;57(3):250-5. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12283. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
10
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.