Murphy M D, Brunell P A, Lievens A W, Shehab Z M
Pediatrics. 1984 Jul;74(1):90-3.
A measles epidemic in San Antonio, Texas provided a population of children who were immunized at less than or equal to 10 months of age and reimmunized at greater than or equal to 15 months of age. Of these children, 302 were evaluated for measles antibody by the sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and their responses were compared with those of 300 children who had been immunized at the customary time (greater than or equal to 15 months) with a single immunization. There were only five seronegative findings in each group. The children immunized at the customary time did have significantly higher (P less than .001) antibody titers than the children immunized at less than or equal to 10 months and reimmunized at greater than or equal to 15 months. These results indicate that early immunization followed by reimmunization may be indicated when young infants are at significant risk of measles exposure. This approach should not create an increased number of serologically nonresponsive children when reimmunized at greater than or equal to 15 months.
德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市的一场麻疹疫情提供了这样一群儿童,他们在10个月及以下时接种了疫苗,并在15个月及以上时再次接种。对这些儿童中的302名,通过灵敏的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)评估其麻疹抗体,并将他们的反应与300名在常规时间(15个月及以上)单次接种疫苗的儿童的反应进行比较。每组中只有5例血清学阴性结果。在常规时间接种疫苗的儿童的抗体滴度确实显著高于在10个月及以下接种且在15个月及以上再次接种的儿童(P<0.001)。这些结果表明,当幼儿有显著的麻疹暴露风险时,可能需要先进行早期免疫然后再进行再次免疫。当在15个月及以上再次接种时,这种方法不会导致血清学无反应儿童数量增加。