Pfaller M A, Sibley T K, Westfall L M, Hoppe-Bauer J E, Keating M A, Murray P R
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):525-30. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.525-530.1982.
The recovery of bacteria and fungi from blood cultures was compared in conventional tryptic soy broth (TSB) bottles and in TSB bottles with an agarcoated slide attachment. A total of 2,662 sets of blood cultures, including 413 that were positive (15.5%), were evaluated. Significantly more gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were recovered in the slide culture bottles than in conventional bottles (299 versus 253 isolates). Growth of gram-positive organisms and fungi was detected in the slide culture bottles 24 to 48 h earlier than in the TSB bottles. In addition, 76% of the isolates in the slide culture system were detected on the agar slide. In comparison, only 40% of the isolates in the TSB bottles were detected initially by blind subculturing. The incidences of contamination were 2.7% (71 cultures) for the slide culture system and 1.5% (39 cultures) for the TSB bottles.
对传统胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤(TSB)瓶和带有琼脂涂层玻片附件的TSB瓶中血培养物的细菌和真菌回收情况进行了比较。共评估了2662套血培养物,其中413套呈阳性(15.5%)。玻片培养瓶中回收的革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌明显多于传统培养瓶(分别为299株和253株)。在玻片培养瓶中检测到革兰氏阳性菌和真菌生长的时间比TSB瓶早24至48小时。此外,玻片培养系统中76%的分离株在琼脂玻片上被检测到。相比之下,TSB瓶中最初通过盲目传代培养检测到的分离株仅为40%。玻片培养系统的污染发生率为2.7%(71份培养物),TSB瓶为1.5%(39份培养物)。