Suppr超能文献

双相培养基加常规早期传代与玻片血培养系统的比较

Comparison of a biphasic medium plus routine early subculture with a slide blood culture system.

作者信息

Degaute C, Chapusette P, Vanoudenhove J L, Pierret C, Serruys-Schoutens E

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Oct;4(5):478-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02014428.

Abstract

The accuracy of a biphasic medium plus routine early subculture on chocolate agar was compared with that of a slide blood culture system for detecting facultatively anaerobic bacteria in blood cultures. Over a three month period 2,745 pairs of blood cultures were examined. Bacteremia was diagnosed in 91 patients. Twelve cases would have been missed by using the slide blood culture system alone, in contrast to only three by the biphasic medium alone. The two techniques detected the same amount of contaminant bacteria. Although the slide blood culture system required less time in general, the biphasic medium proved more accurate for isolating Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.005) and detected gram-positive bacteria more rapidly (p = 0.002).

摘要

将双相培养基加常规早期在巧克力琼脂上进行传代培养的方法与玻片血培养系统在血培养中检测兼性厌氧菌的准确性进行了比较。在三个月的时间里,共检查了2745对血培养样本。91例患者被诊断为菌血症。仅使用玻片血培养系统会漏诊12例,相比之下,仅使用双相培养基则仅漏诊3例。两种技术检测到的污染菌数量相同。虽然一般来说玻片血培养系统所需时间较少,但双相培养基在分离金黄色葡萄球菌方面更准确(p = 0.005),并且能更快地检测到革兰氏阳性菌(p = 0.002)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验