Tanswell A K, Clubb R A, Smith B T, Boston R W
Arch Dis Child. 1980 Jan;55(1):33-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.55.1.33.
A preliminary study was performed in which a simple clinical technique for estimating appropriate levels of continuous distending pressure (CDP) in infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) was used to compare two groups of infants; one group had CDP started very early in life (3.1 +/- 0.3 hours) while in the other treatment was started at a more conventional age (23 +/- 5.4 hours). Appropriate CDP was identified as the point at which transpulmonary transmission of airways pressure to the oesophagus was seen suddenly to increase, while serial measurements allowed CDP levels to be instituted and varied according to physiological signs during the course of each infant's disease. Oxygen requirements fell to less than 35% more rapidly in the early-treated group (10.6 +/- 1.2 v. 67.4 +/- 5.6 hours; P less than 0.001), as did the requirement for a CDP greater than 4 cmH2O (28.9 +/- 5.3 v. 87.6 +/- 14.2 hours; P less than 0.001). Better (P less than 0.01) values for pH, PaCO2, and A-aDO2 were observed in the early-treated group. We believe that the use of this simple technique has numerous advantages and that very early introduction of CDP can be realised in a manner selective enought for it to be used in those infants in whom intervention is justified.
进行了一项初步研究,采用一种简单的临床技术来估计呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)婴儿的合适持续扩张压力(CDP)水平,以比较两组婴儿;一组在生命早期(3.1±0.3小时)就开始使用CDP,而另一组在更常规的年龄(23±5.4小时)开始治疗。合适的CDP被确定为气道压力经肺向食管的传导突然增加的点,同时通过连续测量来确定CDP水平,并根据每个婴儿疾病过程中的生理体征进行调整。早期治疗组的氧气需求下降到低于35%的速度更快(10.6±1.2对67.4±5.6小时;P<0.001),对大于4 cmH2O的CDP的需求也是如此(28.9±5.3对87.6±14.2小时;P<0.001)。早期治疗组的pH、PaCO2和A-aDO2值更好(P<0.01)。我们认为,使用这种简单技术有许多优点,并且可以以足够有选择性的方式尽早引入CDP,以便在有干预指征的婴儿中使用。