Noel M W, Paxinos J
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978 Aug;35(8):933-5.
The prescribing patterns for the cephalosporins and the cost-savings following restriction of cephalothin sodium and approval of cefazolin sodium were studied over a three-year period at a university hospital. The prescribing patterns for cefazolin relative to dose, frequency, duration of therapy and clinical indications were studied for 64 patients during a one-month period. Parenteral cephalosporin use for three years was analyzed to determine comparative use rates and costs. For the most part, cefazolin was used properly during the one-month study. The greatest misuse was as prophylactic therapy in postsurgical patients. The switch from cephalothin to cefazolin resulted in a projected annual savings of $5,500, equal to more than 10% of the hospital's expenditures for parenteral cephalosporins. The prescribed daily dose of cephalosporin dropped by one-third following the formulary change. The decision to use cefazolin as the major parenteral cephalosporin resulted in substantial cost savings.
在一所大学医院进行了为期三年的研究,以探讨头孢菌素的处方模式以及限制头孢噻吩钠使用并批准头孢唑林钠后所节省的费用。在一个月的时间里,对64例患者使用头孢唑林的剂量、频率、治疗持续时间和临床指征的处方模式进行了研究。分析了三年来肠外头孢菌素的使用情况,以确定其相对使用率和成本。在为期一个月的研究中,大部分情况下头孢唑林的使用是恰当的。最严重的误用是在术后患者中作为预防性治疗。从头孢噻吩改用头孢唑林预计每年可节省5500美元,相当于医院肠外头孢菌素支出的10%以上。处方集变更后,头孢菌素的每日规定剂量下降了三分之一。决定将头孢唑林作为主要的肠外头孢菌素使用带来了可观的成本节省。