von Eiff A W, Neus H
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr. 1980 Jun 13;122(24):894-6.
Traffice Noise and Hypertension. First communication: the question whether traffic noise could be a risk factor of essential hypertension was studied by means of interviews. In Bonn 931 inhabitants between 20 and 59 years of age, who lived either in streets with high (minimum: 9062 cars/day) or low (maximum: 1182 cars/day) traffic volumes were interviewed. While no differences were found in the frequencies of treatment of diabetes mellitus, gout, asthma and peptic ulcer, there was a difference in response to treatment of hypertension (p = 0.002); in the noisy area 22.8% and in the quiet area 14.6% of respondents stated that they were treated. Also in both male and females aged 29-39 years, there was a connection between hypertensive treatment and the duration of stay in the noisy area (p less than 0.05).
交通噪音与高血压。首次通讯：通过访谈研究交通噪音是否可能是原发性高血压的危险因素这一问题。在波恩，对931名年龄在20至59岁之间、居住在交通流量高（最低：每天9062辆汽车）或低（最高：每天1182辆汽车）街道的居民进行了访谈。虽然在糖尿病、痛风、哮喘和消化性溃疡的治疗频率方面未发现差异，但在高血压治疗的反应方面存在差异（p = 0.002）；在噪音区域，22.8%的受访者表示正在接受治疗，而在安静区域这一比例为14.6%。同样，在29至39岁的男性和女性中，高血压治疗与在噪音区域的居住时长之间也存在关联（p小于0.05）。
