Kirschen D G, Flom M C
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978 Mar;55(3):144-50. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197803000-00003.
Visual acuity was measured in eccentrically fixating amblyopic subjects to determine the contribution of sensory (inhibitory) and motor (retinal-locus) components of the acuity loss. A unique aspect of this research involved the subjects' use of auditory feedback to control their unsteady and eccentric fixation while responding to flashed (800 msec) or continuously presented targets at various eccentricities in the visual field. All 4 amblyopic eyes had maximum visual acuity at the fovea; from there, the acuity declined approximately symmetrically into the nasal and temporal periphery. Foveal acuity for these amblyopic eyes was depressed from the acuity at the fovea of the normal eye. We conclude that Worth's explanation of eccentric fixation (eccentric fixation develops in an attempt by the amblyopic eye to fixate with a peripheral retinal locus having higher acuity than the fovea) cannot apply to our amblyopes. The acuity losses exhibited by the amblyopic eyes studied have a sensory (inhibition) component and a motor (retinal-locus) component, the sensory component being greater for small degrees of eccentric fixation and the motor component being greater for large amounts of eccentric fixation.
