Catling J A, Pinto D M, Jordan C, Jones J G
Br Med J. 1980 Aug 16;281(6238):478-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6238.478.
Two methods of administering papaveretum for relieving postoperative pain were compared in two groups of patients who had undergone cholecystectomy. In one group a loading dose of papaveretum was administered by continuous intravenous infusion (1 mg/min) until the patient could breathe deeply without undue pain. Eight times this loading dose was given as a continuous intravenous infusion over the subsequent 48 hours. This regimen was compared with a conventional intermittent intramuscular dose (0.25 mg/kg at four hourly intervals as necessary) in a second group of patients. The intravenous regimen relieved pain better than the intramuscular regimen, which may have reflected the larger dose of papaveretum given to the intravenous group, but it was accompanied by a greater degree of respiratory depression and potentially life-threatening changes in respiratory pattern. These findings suggest that the fear which often accounts for inadequate postoperative pain relief-that larger dose of analgesics will cause respiratory complications-is well founded.
在两组接受胆囊切除术的患者中,对两种给予罂粟碱以缓解术后疼痛的方法进行了比较。在一组患者中,通过持续静脉输注给予负荷剂量的罂粟碱(1毫克/分钟),直到患者能够深呼吸且无过度疼痛。在随后的48小时内,以持续静脉输注的方式给予该负荷剂量8倍的量。在第二组患者中,将该方案与传统的间歇性肌内注射剂量(必要时每4小时0.25毫克/千克)进行比较。静脉给药方案比肌内给药方案能更好地缓解疼痛,这可能反映了静脉组给予的罂粟碱剂量更大,但它伴随着更严重的呼吸抑制程度以及呼吸模式中潜在的危及生命的变化。这些发现表明,常常导致术后疼痛缓解不足的担忧——即更大剂量的镇痛药会引起呼吸并发症——是有充分根据的。