Barry A L, Thornsberry C, Jones R N, Gerlach E H
Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Apr;75(4):524-31. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/75.4.524.
Studies were undertaken to reevaluate interpretive zone standards for gentamicin and tobramycin disc tests. Disc tests with an investigational aminoglycoside, sisomicin, were also evaluated. The data suggest modification of zone standards for gentamicin disc tests to R (resistant) less than or equal to 12 mm and S (susceptible) greater than or equal to 16 mm. Currently recommended standards for tobramycin disc tests (R less than or equal to 12 mm and S greater than or equal to 15 mm) were found to be satisfactory. For 10-microgram sisomicin discs, zone standards of R less than or equal to 12 mm and S greater than or equal to 15 mm were also appropriate. Although gentamicin is structurally similar to sisomicin, it was less active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The activity spectrum of sisomicin against the collection of 470 bacterial isolates studied more nearly resembled that of tobramycin. Data analysis suggested that tobramycin disc tests might be used to predict susceptibility to sisomicin. However, these two drugs differ in their susceptibilities to aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes produced by some resistant strains. In those institutions where such strains are endemic, the class concept of disc testing may not be applicable.
开展了多项研究以重新评估庆大霉素和妥布霉素纸片扩散试验的解释性抑菌圈标准。还对一种研究用氨基糖苷类药物西索米星的纸片扩散试验进行了评估。数据表明,庆大霉素纸片扩散试验的抑菌圈标准应修改为:R(耐药)小于或等于12毫米,S(敏感)大于或等于16毫米。目前推荐的妥布霉素纸片扩散试验标准(R小于或等于12毫米,S大于或等于15毫米)被认为是令人满意的。对于10微克的西索米星纸片,R小于或等于12毫米和S大于或等于15毫米的抑菌圈标准也是合适的。虽然庆大霉素在结构上与西索米星相似,但它对铜绿假单胞菌的活性较低。西索米星对所研究的470株细菌分离株的活性谱与妥布霉素更为相似。数据分析表明,妥布霉素纸片扩散试验可用于预测对西索米星的敏感性。然而,这两种药物对某些耐药菌株产生的氨基糖苷类灭活酶的敏感性不同。在那些此类菌株为地方流行的机构中,纸片扩散试验的类别概念可能不适用。