Ojanen T H, Terho E O, Mäntyjärvi R A
Allergy. 1982 Jul;37(5):297-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1982.tb01915.x.
A comparison was made between Aspergillus fumigatus and A. umbrosus antigens regarding their usefulness in serological tests of farmer's lung. Mycelial and culture fluid antigens of both microbes were used to test sera of 30 Finnish farmer's lung patients for antibodies in the ELISA and in the gel precipitation (GP) test. Antibodies to A. umbrosus were more common than to A. fumigatus; this was especially evident in ELISA, ELISA gave more positive results with all four antigens than GP. Mycelial antigens showed more positive reactions in ELISA than the corresponding culture fluid antigens. The situation was reversed in GP. Selection of antigens in the diagnostic panel of farmer's lung requires careful consideration. Our results suggest that other Aspergilli (in the Finnish population A. umbrosus) might be preferable to A. fumigatus in the antigen panel.
对烟曲霉和荫蔽曲霉抗原在农民肺血清学检测中的效用进行了比较。使用这两种微生物的菌丝体和培养液抗原,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和凝胶沉淀(GP)试验检测30例芬兰农民肺患者血清中的抗体。针对荫蔽曲霉的抗体比针对烟曲霉的更常见;这在ELISA中尤为明显,所有四种抗原在ELISA中产生的阳性结果都比GP更多。菌丝体抗原在ELISA中显示出比相应培养液抗原更多的阳性反应。在GP中情况则相反。农民肺诊断组中抗原的选择需要仔细考虑。我们的结果表明,在抗原组中,其他曲霉菌(在芬兰人群中为荫蔽曲霉)可能比烟曲霉更可取。