Flatau E, Lewinsohn G, Konichezky S, Lev A, Barzilay E
Crit Care Med. 1982 Nov;10(11):733-5.
High frequency positive pressure ventilation (HFPPV) was compared with normal frequency positive pressure ventilation (NFPPV) during diagnostic fiberoptic-bronchoscopy. HFPPV was achieved by a simple modification of the Minivent, and gave satisfactory alveolar ventilation and oxygenation. In all 11 patients and over periods of at least 40 min, HFPPV gave normal PaCO2 and high levels of PAO2. Arterial blood pressures were higher and the airway pressures were lower than during NFPPV.
在诊断性纤维支气管镜检查期间，对高频正压通气（HFPPV）和常频正压通气（NFPPV）进行了比较。通过对小儿麻醉通气机进行简单改装实现了高频正压通气，其能提供令人满意的肺泡通气和氧合。在所有11例患者中，至少持续40分钟的高频正压通气期间，动脉血二氧化碳分压（PaCO2）正常，肺泡氧分压（PAO2）水平较高。与常频正压通气期间相比，动脉血压更高，气道压力更低。
