• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Toward a rationale for the seclusion process.

作者信息

Plutchik R, Karasu T B, Conte H R, Siegel B, Jerrett I

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1978 Aug;166(8):571-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197808000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-197808000-00004
PMID:681917
Abstract

The present paper summarizes three studies focusing on different aspects of seclusion room practices. The first study involved chart review to collect empirical data on reasons for seclusion, length of seclusion, and characteristics of secluded patients. The second study focused on staff attitudes toward seclusion; the third dealt with the attitudes of both secluded and nonsecluded patients. The average time of seclusion was approximately 4 hours and in most cases aggressive behaviors of various types were cited as the precipitating event. In addition, patient and staff attitudes implied that a major function of the seclusion process was to isolate patients from disturbing interactions and to maintain the smooth functioning of the ward minisociety. Two models of seclusion, an ethological model and a behavioristic "time out" model, were developed in order to integrate the results of these studies. Implications of the findings and models are presented for changes in seclusion room procedures.

摘要

相似文献

1
Toward a rationale for the seclusion process.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1978 Aug;166(8):571-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197808000-00004.
2
[About the use of seclusion in psychiatry: the patients' point of view].[关于精神病学中隔离措施的使用:患者视角]
Encephale. 2004 May-Jun;30(3):276-84. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95440-1.
3
Attitudes of nonsecluded patients toward seclusion rooms.非隔离患者对隔离病房的态度。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1988 Jul;10(4):280-4. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(88)90036-9.
4
Patterns of seclusion. A prospective study.隔离模式。一项前瞻性研究。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1981 Jan;169(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198101000-00005.
5
Seclusion in an enriched environment versus seclusion as usual: A quasi-experimental study using mixed methods.丰富环境中隔离与常规隔离的比较:一项使用混合方法的准实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 11;16(11):e0259620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259620. eCollection 2021.
6
The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective.精神疾病患者与社会排斥:从患者视角对隔离使用情况的批判性审视。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Sep;25(6):559-78. doi: 10.1080/01612840490472101.
7
Staff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?工作人员和患者对隔离的看法:有什么变化吗?
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jul;47(1):33-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03062.x.
8
Seclusion or solitary confinement: therapeutic or punitive treatment?隔离或单独监禁:是治疗性还是惩罚性的治疗方式?
Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs. 1996 Dec;5(4):171-9.
9
A comparison of patient and staff attitudes toward seclusion.患者与医护人员对隔离态度的比较。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1985 May;173(5):282-91. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198505000-00006.
10
[Determinants of seclusion in a psychiatric institution: a naturalistic and exploratory study].[精神病院隔离的决定因素:一项自然主义探索性研究]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2012;54(3):211-21.

引用本文的文献

1
"Disruptive Behavior" or "Expected Benefit" Are Rationales of Seclusion Without Prior Aggression.“破坏性行为”或“预期益处”是无先前攻击行为情况下隔离的理由。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 15;13:871525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.871525. eCollection 2022.
2
Measuring Staff Attitudes to Coercion in Poland.衡量波兰员工对强制手段的态度。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 16;12:745215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745215. eCollection 2021.
3
The Role of Implicit and Explicit Staff Attitudes in the Use of Coercive Measures in Psychiatry.隐性和显性员工态度在精神病学强制手段使用中的作用
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 18;12:699446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.699446. eCollection 2021.
4
Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.成人精神病学中隔离与约束的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 16;10:491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491. eCollection 2019.
5
Do patient and ward-related characteristics influence the use of coercive measures? Results from the EUNOMIA international study.患者及病房相关特征会影响强制措施的使用吗?EUNOMIA国际研究的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;49(10):1619-29. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0872-6. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
6
Organizational and unit factors contributing to reduction in the use of seclusion and restraint procedures on an acute psychiatric inpatient unit.促成急性精神科住院单元减少使用隔离和约束措施的组织及单位因素。
Psychiatr Q. 2007 Mar;78(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s11126-006-9028-5.
7
Physical restraint elimination in the acute care setting: ethical considerations.急症护理环境中消除身体约束:伦理考量
HEC Forum. 1998 Sep-Dec;10(3-4):244-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1008844314555.
8
Physical control of patients on an inpatient setting: forensic vs. civil populations.住院环境中对患者的身体控制:法医鉴定人群与民事人群
Psychiatr Q. 1995 Summer;66(2):133-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02238860.
9
Locking up patients with psychiatric illness.将患有精神疾病的患者关押起来。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Feb 19;286(6365):581-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6365.581.
10
[Isolation and forced injection in the opinion of affected patients and patient care personnel. An accompanied quarter year sample].
Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1983;233(3):211-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00343597.