Klein M, Lloyd I, Redman C, Bull M, Turnbull A C
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):118-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08894.x.
Samples of records of comparable low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in an integrated general practice unit (GPU) and a consultant (or shared-care) system were derived from a computer tape of all 5005 births which occurred at the John Radcliffe Hospital in 1978. Induction of labour, epidural analgesia and forceps delivery were all less frequently carried out in women booked for delivery in the GPU. Infants of multiparous women were more often intubated in the shared-care system (3%) than in the GPU (0%); rates in infants of nulliparous women were similar (approx. 7%) in the two systems. These data suggest that short-term outcomes are as good for GPU-booked low-risk women and their infants as for comparable women booked in consultant or shared-care.
1978年在约翰·拉德克利夫医院出生的5005例分娩记录的计算机磁带中，选取了在综合全科医疗单位（GPU）和顾问（或共享护理）系统中登记分娩的低风险孕妇的可比记录样本。在GPU登记分娩的妇女中，引产、硬膜外镇痛和产钳分娩的实施频率都较低。经产妇的婴儿在共享护理系统中的插管率（3%）高于GPU（0%）；初产妇的婴儿在两个系统中的插管率相似（约7%）。这些数据表明，对于在GPU登记的低风险妇女及其婴儿，短期结局与在顾问或共享护理系统中登记的可比妇女一样好。
