Abramczyk R R, Jordan D E, Hegel M
Percept Mot Skills. 1983 Feb;56(1):99-106. doi: 10.2466/pms.1983.56.1.99.
The hypothesis was tested that a group of 30 schizophrenic in contrast to a control group of 35 non-schizophrenic patients would demonstrate substantial and significantly more "Reverse" interference in reading incongruent word-color combinations on the Stroop Color-Word Interference Test. Results supported the hypothesis. A "reverse" interference of 19% and of 9% was observed in the groups' performances, respectively. The group performance differences were much larger on both the classical "Stroop" and "Reverse" interference tasks than on corresponding non-interference tasks. But these interactions were not statistically significant. Measures of absolute and proportional performance decrements on the interference tasks showed no correlations between "Stroop" and "Reverse" interference. Issues discussed included impaired selective attention in schizophrenics' performance, the unexpected high "Reverse" effect in control data and the psychodiagnostic applications of reverse interference.
与35名非精神分裂症患者的对照组相比，一组30名精神分裂症患者在Stroop颜色-文字干扰测试中阅读不一致的文字-颜色组合时，会表现出显著更多的“反向”干扰。结果支持了这一假设。在两组的表现中，分别观察到19%和9%的“反向”干扰。在经典的“Stroop”和“反向”干扰任务中，两组的表现差异比在相应的非干扰任务中要大得多。但这些交互作用在统计学上并不显著。干扰任务中绝对和比例表现下降的测量结果显示，“Stroop”干扰和“反向”干扰之间没有相关性。讨论的问题包括精神分裂症患者表现中选择性注意力受损、对照数据中意外的高“反向”效应以及反向干扰的心理诊断应用。
