Williams B, Fahy G
J Neurosurg. 1983 Feb;58(2):188-97. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.2.0188.
The clinical course of 31 patients who underwent attempted excision of the filum terminale and tip of the conus for syringomyelia is summarized. Of these patients, 17 had had some previous surgical intervention. Eleven patients were continuing to deteriorate at the time of the operation. In three cases, marked postoperative improvement was reported, and objective improvement was thought to result from the conus excision. Eighteen more patients claimed improvement in their preoperative symptoms of loss of pain sensibility, deafness, or reduced motor function, although most of such claims were unverified by objective clinical assessment. Sixteen of the patients who improved have since proceeded to deteriorate. In five of the patients, there was a long-standing improvement of at least subjective phenomena. Thirteen patients were not improved even subjectively and some of these have continued to grow worse. Proof that the greater part of the syrinx was in communication with the conus or filum was difficult to obtain even when the conus was dilated. No correlations have been found to suggest that the operation might be more effective if the central canal was patent at the conus or the filum, nor was there a correlation between a good clinical result and either the age of the patient or the age of the syrinx as judged by the history. The operation did not seem to be more or less beneficial if previous surgery had been performed. The suggestion is made that for syringomyelia with hindbrain abnormalities, other than dense arachnoiditis (particularly if there is evidence of pressure dissociation at the foramen magnum), craniovertebral decompression remains the procedure of choice. In syringomyelia with marked hydrocephalus, drainage by a valved shunt may be the preferred first procedure. If myelotomy is planned it should probably be done where the syrinx is wide, and it is more likely to succeed if the syrinx is drained to a low-pressure area outside the theca, such as the peritoneum or pleura, rather than the subarachnoid space.
总结了31例因脊髓空洞症而尝试切除终丝和圆锥尖端的患者的临床病程。在这些患者中,17例曾接受过一些先前的手术干预。11例患者在手术时病情仍在恶化。有3例报告术后有明显改善,认为客观改善是由圆锥切除所致。另有18例患者称术前疼痛感觉丧失、耳聋或运动功能减退等症状有所改善,尽管这些说法大多未经客观临床评估证实。16例病情改善的患者后来病情又恶化了。有5例患者至少主观症状有长期改善。13例患者甚至主观上也没有改善,其中一些患者病情持续恶化。即使圆锥扩张,也很难获得证据证明大部分空洞与圆锥或终丝相通。没有发现相关性表明如果圆锥或终丝处的中央管通畅手术可能会更有效,根据病史判断,临床效果良好与患者年龄或空洞存在时间之间也没有相关性。如果之前做过手术,此次手术似乎并没有或多或少的益处。有人提出,对于伴有后脑异常的脊髓空洞症,除了致密性蛛网膜炎(特别是如果有枕骨大孔处压力分离的证据)外,颅颈减压仍是首选的手术方法。对于伴有明显脑积水的脊髓空洞症,带瓣分流引流可能是首选的第一步手术。如果计划进行脊髓切开术,可能应该在空洞较宽的部位进行,如果将空洞引流到硬脊膜外的低压区域,如腹膜或胸膜,而不是蛛网膜下腔,则更有可能成功。