Viander M, Valovirta E, Vanto T, Koivikko A
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1983;71(3):252-60.
The commercial cat and dog allergen extracts are traditionally prepared from pelt, fur or dander. However, there is increased evidence of the allergenicity of saliva and urine of the animals. We have investigated 25 asthmatic children with a positive cat and/or dog RAST result. All 20 subjects with a positive cat RAST gave a positive skin prick test result to cat saliva, cat urine and cat hair. Analogously, all 20 subjects with a positive dog RAST had a positive skin reaction to dog saliva, urine and dander. In RAST inhibition experiments with dog and cat allergen discs, dog saliva appeared to be at least as potent as a commercial dog dander and hair extract, while cat saliva was less potent than the respective commercial extract. Both dog and cat salivas were clearly more potent than the respective urine. Significant cross-reactivity was observed between cat hair and dog dander in the RAST inhibition, whereas saliva and urine were shown to be more species-specific. An experimental dog dander preparation had about the same specificity as, and even higher allergenic activity than, that of dog saliva or urine. Our results suggest that saliva actually may be the best source of cat and dog allergen preparations. The importance of urine warrants further investigation.
传统上,商业用猫和狗过敏原提取物是从动物的皮毛、毛发或皮屑中制备的。然而,越来越多的证据表明动物的唾液和尿液也具有致敏性。我们对25名猫和/或狗RAST检测结果呈阳性的哮喘儿童进行了调查。所有20名猫RAST检测呈阳性的受试者对猫唾液、猫尿液和猫毛的皮肤点刺试验结果均为阳性。类似地,所有20名狗RAST检测呈阳性的受试者对狗唾液、尿液和皮屑的皮肤反应均为阳性。在使用狗和猫过敏原盘的RAST抑制实验中,狗唾液的效力似乎至少与商业用狗皮屑和毛发提取物相当,而猫唾液的效力则低于相应的商业提取物。狗和猫的唾液效力均明显高于各自的尿液。在RAST抑制实验中,观察到猫毛和狗皮屑之间存在显著的交叉反应,而唾液和尿液则表现出更强的种属特异性。一种实验性狗皮屑制剂的特异性与狗唾液或尿液相当,甚至具有更高的致敏活性。我们的结果表明,唾液实际上可能是制备猫和狗过敏原制剂的最佳来源。尿液的重要性值得进一步研究。