Suppr超能文献

毛皮养殖工人和毛皮服装工人对毛皮动物过敏原和家畜过敏原的IgE反应。

IgE response to fur animal allergens and domestic animal allergens in fur farmers and fur garment workers.

作者信息

Savolainen J, Uitti J, Halmepuro L, Nordman H

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 1997 May;27(5):501-9.

PMID:9179423
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the IgE response to the most commonly farmed fur animals with that to domestic animals.

METHODS

IgE-immunoblotting and RAST-inhibition analyses were performed using RAST-positive sera from fur workers sensitized to fur allergens and sera from patients sensitized to domestic animal allergens.

RESULTS

The urine extracts of mink, blue fox, silver fox, raccoon dog and fitchew contained more protein bands than the fur extracts did. Allergens with the same molecular weight were found in all of the fur and urine extracts. The most prominent allergenic bands had molecular weights of 62-67 kDa, 23-25 kDa and 18-19 kDa. With crossreacting sera the reciprocal RAST inhibition with all five animal extracts indicated common IgE-binding epitopes, probably common allergens (especially the 62-67 kDa bands). Urine and fur contain common allergens, since urine allergens strongly inhibited the IgE-binding to fur allergens. The IgE binding to allergenic bands of fur animal extracts was also observed in immunoblotting when dog and cat RAST-positive sera were used, but not for cow RAST-positive sera. RAST inhibition of dog-positive sera with fur animal extracts and fur-positive sera with dog extract confirmed the crossreactivity of these IgE antibodies. No such inhibition was seen with cow extract.

CONCLUSION

The results of the RAST inhibition and immunoblotting suggest that fur animals have IgE binding epitopes or allergens in common with cat and dog--possibly albumin--but not with cow.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较对最常见养殖毛皮动物的IgE反应与对家畜的IgE反应。

方法

使用对毛皮过敏原致敏的毛皮工人的RAST阳性血清以及对家畜过敏原致敏的患者血清进行IgE免疫印迹和RAST抑制分析。

结果

水貂、蓝狐、银狐、貉和艾鼬的尿液提取物比毛皮提取物含有更多的蛋白条带。在所有毛皮和尿液提取物中均发现了分子量相同的过敏原。最突出的致敏条带分子量为62 - 67 kDa、23 - 25 kDa和18 - 19 kDa。使用交叉反应血清时,所有五种动物提取物的相互RAST抑制表明存在共同的IgE结合表位,可能是共同过敏原(尤其是62 - 67 kDa条带)。尿液和毛皮含有共同过敏原,因为尿液过敏原强烈抑制IgE与毛皮过敏原的结合。当使用狗和猫的RAST阳性血清时,在免疫印迹中也观察到IgE与毛皮动物提取物的致敏条带结合,但牛的RAST阳性血清未出现这种情况。用毛皮动物提取物对狗阳性血清进行RAST抑制以及用狗提取物对毛皮阳性血清进行RAST抑制证实了这些IgE抗体的交叉反应性。用牛提取物未观察到这种抑制。

结论

RAST抑制和免疫印迹结果表明,毛皮动物与猫和狗有共同的IgE结合表位或过敏原——可能是白蛋白——但与牛没有。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验