Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY; André Cournand Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory, Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY.
Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2356-2365. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.052. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented.
Across a population of patients and healthy participants, do values for total lung capacity (TLC) determined by the novel compact device (MiniBox, PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd.) compare favorably with measurements determined by traditional whole body plethysmography?
A total of 266 participants (130 men) and respiratory patients were recruited from five global centers (three in Europe and two in the United States). The study population comprised individuals with obstructive (n = 197) and restrictive (n = 33) disorders as well as healthy participants (n = 36). TLC measured by conventional plethysmography (TLC) was compared with TLC measured by the MiniBox (TLC).
TLC values ranged between 2.7 and 10.9 L. The normalized root mean square difference (NSD) between TLC and TLC was 7.0% in healthy participants. In obstructed patients, the NSD was 7.9% in mild obstruction and 9.1% in severe obstruction. In restricted patients, the NSD was 7.8% in mild restriction and 13.9% in moderate and severe restriction. No significant differences were found between TLC values obtained by the two measurement techniques. Also no significant differences were found in results obtained among the five centers.
TLC as measured by the novel MiniBox system is not significantly different from TLC measured by conventional whole body plethysmography, thus validating the MiniBox method as a reliable method to measure absolute lung volumes.
目前测量绝对肺容量的技术依赖于庞大且昂贵的设备,并且对于操作人员和患者来说都很复杂。本文提出了一种测量绝对肺容量的新方法,即 MiniBox 方法。
在患者和健康参与者人群中,新型紧凑型设备(PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices,Ltd. 的 MiniBox)确定的总肺容量(TLC)值与传统全身体积描记法( plethysmography)确定的值相比是否具有优势?
这项研究共纳入了来自五个全球中心(三个在欧洲,两个在美国)的 266 名参与者(130 名男性)和呼吸科患者。研究人群包括阻塞性(n=197)和限制性(n=33)疾病患者以及健康参与者(n=36)。使用传统体积描记法(TLC)测量 TLC,与使用 MiniBox 测量的 TLC 进行比较。
TLC 值范围在 2.7 到 10.9 L 之间。健康参与者中,TLC 和 TLC 的归一化均方根差(NSD)为 7.0%。在阻塞性患者中,轻度阻塞的 NSD 为 7.9%,重度阻塞的 NSD 为 9.1%。在限制性患者中,轻度受限的 NSD 为 7.8%,中度和重度受限的 NSD 为 13.9%。两种测量技术获得的 TLC 值之间无显著差异。此外,五个中心的结果也无显著差异。
新型 MiniBox 系统测量的 TLC 与传统全身体积描记法测量的 TLC 无显著差异,从而验证了 MiniBox 方法是一种可靠的测量绝对肺容量的方法。