Suppr超能文献

新型肺容量测量紧凑系统的验证。

Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY; André Cournand Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory, Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY.

Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2356-2365. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.052. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Across a population of patients and healthy participants, do values for total lung capacity (TLC) determined by the novel compact device (MiniBox, PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd.) compare favorably with measurements determined by traditional whole body plethysmography?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 266 participants (130 men) and respiratory patients were recruited from five global centers (three in Europe and two in the United States). The study population comprised individuals with obstructive (n = 197) and restrictive (n = 33) disorders as well as healthy participants (n = 36). TLC measured by conventional plethysmography (TLC) was compared with TLC measured by the MiniBox (TLC).

RESULTS

TLC values ranged between 2.7 and 10.9 L. The normalized root mean square difference (NSD) between TLC and TLC was 7.0% in healthy participants. In obstructed patients, the NSD was 7.9% in mild obstruction and 9.1% in severe obstruction. In restricted patients, the NSD was 7.8% in mild restriction and 13.9% in moderate and severe restriction. No significant differences were found between TLC values obtained by the two measurement techniques. Also no significant differences were found in results obtained among the five centers.

INTERPRETATION

TLC as measured by the novel MiniBox system is not significantly different from TLC measured by conventional whole body plethysmography, thus validating the MiniBox method as a reliable method to measure absolute lung volumes.

摘要

背景

目前测量绝对肺容量的技术依赖于庞大且昂贵的设备,并且对于操作人员和患者来说都很复杂。本文提出了一种测量绝对肺容量的新方法,即 MiniBox 方法。

研究问题

在患者和健康参与者人群中,新型紧凑型设备(PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices,Ltd. 的 MiniBox)确定的总肺容量(TLC)值与传统全身体积描记法( plethysmography)确定的值相比是否具有优势?

研究设计和方法

这项研究共纳入了来自五个全球中心(三个在欧洲,两个在美国)的 266 名参与者(130 名男性)和呼吸科患者。研究人群包括阻塞性(n=197)和限制性(n=33)疾病患者以及健康参与者(n=36)。使用传统体积描记法(TLC)测量 TLC,与使用 MiniBox 测量的 TLC 进行比较。

结果

TLC 值范围在 2.7 到 10.9 L 之间。健康参与者中,TLC 和 TLC 的归一化均方根差(NSD)为 7.0%。在阻塞性患者中,轻度阻塞的 NSD 为 7.9%,重度阻塞的 NSD 为 9.1%。在限制性患者中,轻度受限的 NSD 为 7.8%,中度和重度受限的 NSD 为 13.9%。两种测量技术获得的 TLC 值之间无显著差异。此外,五个中心的结果也无显著差异。

结论

新型 MiniBox 系统测量的 TLC 与传统全身体积描记法测量的 TLC 无显著差异,从而验证了 MiniBox 方法是一种可靠的测量绝对肺容量的方法。

相似文献

1
Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes.新型肺容量测量紧凑系统的验证。
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2356-2365. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.052. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
What is the clinical value of lung volumes?肺容积的临床价值是什么?
Respir Care. 2012 Jan;57(1):26-35; discussion 35-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01374.

本文引用的文献

6
Interpretative strategies for lung function tests.肺功能测试的解读策略。
Eur Respir J. 2005 Nov;26(5):948-68. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205.
7
Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes.肺容积测量的标准化
Eur Respir J. 2005 Sep;26(3):511-22. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035005.
8
Standardisation of spirometry.肺活量测定法的标准化
Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验