Siegel J P, Remington J S
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):63-70. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.63-70.1983.
We compared two methods for quantitating antigen-specific antibody by a reverse enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In the serial-dilution method, the result was determined to be the highest dilution of a serum yielding an absorbance above an established threshold. In the single-dilution method, the result was determined by comparing the absorbance yielded by the test serum at a standard dilution to that yielded by positive and negative reference sera at the same dilution. The results in the single-dilution method reflected the antigen-specific immunoglobulin M antibody activity as a proportion of total immunoglobulin M antibody in a serum, i.e., the immune load, whereas the results in the serial-dilution method reflected the absolute concentration of antigen-specific immunoglobulin M antibody activity. Compared with results in the serial-dilution method, results in the single-dilution method had considerably greater reproducibility on a day-to-day basis and under various test conditions. The single-dilution method was more useful in discriminating between sera from patients in an early stage of clinical infection due to Toxoplasma gondii and sera from patients in a later stage of infection.
我们通过反向酶联免疫吸附测定法比较了两种定量抗原特异性抗体的方法。在系列稀释法中,结果被确定为血清产生高于既定阈值吸光度的最高稀释度。在单稀释法中,通过将测试血清在标准稀释度下产生的吸光度与阳性和阴性参考血清在相同稀释度下产生的吸光度进行比较来确定结果。单稀释法的结果反映了血清中抗原特异性免疫球蛋白M抗体活性占总免疫球蛋白M抗体的比例,即免疫负荷,而系列稀释法的结果反映了抗原特异性免疫球蛋白M抗体活性的绝对浓度。与系列稀释法的结果相比,单稀释法的结果在日常和各种测试条件下具有更高的重现性。单稀释法在区分刚地弓形虫临床感染早期患者的血清和感染后期患者的血清方面更有用。