Shukla R K
Nurs Res. 1981 Jul-Aug;30(4):236-41.
This paper raises the question, "Is it the structure or the competency of the nursing staff that improves the quality of primary nursing over team nursing?" In the study an all-RN model of primary nursing was compared to a team nursing care system. The nursing competency scores of registered nurses on the two units were equalized through six months of continuing education and staff development programs, and the nursing competencies and the quality of patient care were measured by Slater and Qualpac scores, respectively. Although the primary nursing unit scored higher than the team unit on five out of six subscales, the scores were statistically significant (p = .06) only on one, the communications subscale. Results of this study were compared to Felton's study, which found primary nursing units had a more competent nursing staff and higher Qualpac scores. The comparison suggests that nursing competencies may be a stronger contributing factor to the quality of care than is the structure of primary nursing.
“是护理人员的结构还是能力提升了责任制护理相对于小组护理的质量?”在该研究中,将全注册护士模式的责任制护理与小组护理系统进行了比较。通过为期六个月的继续教育和员工发展项目,使两个科室注册护士的护理能力得分达到均衡,并且分别用斯莱特(Slater)评分和优质护理评估量表(Qualpac)评分来衡量护理能力和患者护理质量。尽管在六个子量表中的五个上,责任制护理科室的得分高于小组护理科室,但只有在沟通子量表上,得分具有统计学意义(p = 0.06)。本研究结果与费尔顿(Felton)的研究进行了比较,后者发现责任制护理科室拥有能力更强的护理人员且优质护理评估量表得分更高。该比较表明,护理能力可能是比责任制护理结构对护理质量贡献更大的因素。