Hinshaw A S, Atwood J R
Nurs Res. 1982 May-Jun;31(3):170-5, 191.
The Patient Satisfaction Instrument (PSI) was developed over a series of five clinical and administrative studies during a period of eight years, with a total of 600 patients, primarily medical-surgical inpatients and outpatients. The process illustrates measurement precision by replication. The PSI is a Likert-type summated rating scale with three dimensions of patient satisfaction: technical-professional care, trust, patient education. It was adapted for use with inpatients from Risser's out-patient instrument. Internal consistency estimates appear satisfactory and stable across the various studies; for example, alpha coefficients for the Technical-Professional subscale average .79, Education coefficients average .78, and Trust coefficients average .88. Interitem, item-subscale, and interscale correlations corroborate the alphas. Construct validity estimates were made via convergent/discriminant technique, discriminance, and predictive modeling. Empirical correlations moderately substantiated the multiple, convergent/discriminant predictions. Discriminance was strongly documented for all but the Education subscale, which had modest support. Predictive modeling produced moderate to strong validity estimates. Overall, the PSI has acceptable levels of validity and reliability with refinements indicated.
患者满意度量表(PSI)是在为期八年的一系列五项临床和管理研究中开发出来的,共有600名患者参与,主要是内科-外科住院患者和门诊患者。该过程通过重复验证说明了测量精度。PSI是一种李克特式累加评分量表,包含患者满意度的三个维度:技术-专业护理、信任、患者教育。它是从里瑟的门诊量表改编而来用于住院患者的。在各项研究中,内部一致性估计值看起来令人满意且稳定;例如,技术-专业子量表的阿尔法系数平均为0.79,教育系数平均为0.78,信任系数平均为0.88。项目间、项目-子量表和子量表间的相关性证实了阿尔法系数。通过收敛/判别技术、判别分析和预测建模进行了结构效度估计。实证相关性适度证实了多重收敛/判别预测。除教育子量表支持力度较小外,所有子量表的判别分析都有充分记录。预测建模产生了中等至较强的效度估计。总体而言,PSI具有可接受的效度和信度水平,但仍需改进。