Ferede Abebaw Jember, Erlandsson Kerstin, Gezie Lemma Derseh, Geda Biftu, Wettergren Lena
Department of Medical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar 196, Ethiopia.
School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, 791 88 Falun, Sweden.
Nurs Rep. 2022 May 26;12(2):387-396. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12020037.
Background: The Caring Behaviors Inventory-16 (CBI-16) is a comprehensive instrument measuring caring behaviors as experienced by patients. The study aimed to translate, culturally adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the CBI-16 among adult patients who speak the Amharic language. Methods: The measure was completed by 304 hospitalized patients. Construct validity was evaluated via exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and contrasted groups’ validity. Total CBI-16 scores were compared between groups that differed in self-rated satisfaction with care (Patient Satisfaction Instrument) to examine the contrasted groups’ validity. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha). Results: The EFA suggested a four-factor model accounting for 66.1% of the total variance. The items loaded onto the subscales were similar to the CBI-24. The CFA supported the four-factor model with acceptable fit indices: normed Chi-square value 2.65 (X2 = 259.60, df = 98), SRMR = 0.06, and RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.88 and TLI = 0.86. The contrasted groups’ validity was supported by significantly higher CBI-16 scores reported by patients more satisfied with their care (t = 3.66, p < 0.001). The reliability of the instrument was satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83). Conclusions: The Amharic version of the CBI-16 displayed a four-factor solution and was shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of the perceptions of caring behaviors in Ethiopia.
关怀行为量表-16(CBI-16)是一种全面的工具,用于测量患者所体验到的关怀行为。本研究旨在对阿姆哈拉语成年患者进行CBI-16的翻译、文化调适并评估其心理测量特性。方法:304名住院患者完成了该量表。通过探索性因素分析(EFA)、验证性因素分析(CFA)和对比组效度来评估结构效度。比较了在护理自我评定满意度方面存在差异的组(患者满意度量表)之间的CBI-16总分,以检验对比组效度。使用内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数)评估信度。结果:EFA提出了一个四因素模型,解释了总方差的66.1%。加载到子量表上的项目与CBI-24相似。CFA支持四因素模型,拟合指数可接受:标准化卡方值2.65(X2 = 259.60,df = 98),SRMR = 0.06,RMSEA = 0.07,CFI = 0.88,TLI = 0.86。对护理更满意的患者报告的CBI-16得分显著更高,支持了对比组效度(t = 3.66,p < 0.001)。该工具的信度令人满意(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.83)。结论:阿姆哈拉语版的CBI-16呈现出四因素解决方案,被证明是评估埃塞俄比亚关怀行为认知的有效且可靠的工具。