Fellingham G W, Roundy E S, Fisher A G, Bryce G R
Med Sci Sports. 1978 Summer;10(2):132-6.
Twenty-four young adult male subjects were used to study the relationship between total caloric costs (exercise and recovery costs) incurred and speed of movement over a distance of 1 mile. Caloric costs were determined at walking speeds of 3, 4, and 5 mph and at running speeds of 5, 7, and 9 mph. Energy costs were assessed every 20 sec during the activity and during the recovery until the caloric cost returned to pre-established resting levels. The fitness level of the subjects was considered as a moderating variable. 3regression equations to predict caloric cost from body weight, speed of movement, and VO2 max were also developed. Conclusions for the given speeds were: (1) running is more costly than walking, (2) the cost of walking a mile increases with speed of movement, and (3) for running speeds, total caloric cost and VO2 max are inversely related. The independent variables for the regression equation for walking included body weight and speed squared times body weight (R2 = .86). The independent variables for the running equation were identical to the ones used in the walking equation with the addition of speed times VO2 max (R2 = .62).
24名年轻成年男性受试者被用于研究在1英里的距离上所产生的总热量消耗(运动和恢复消耗)与运动速度之间的关系。热量消耗是在3、4和5英里每小时的步行速度以及5、7和9英里每小时的跑步速度下测定的。在活动期间和恢复期间,每20秒评估一次能量消耗,直到热量消耗恢复到预先设定的静息水平。受试者的健康水平被视为一个调节变量。还建立了3个回归方程,用于根据体重、运动速度和最大摄氧量预测热量消耗。对于给定速度得出的结论如下:(1)跑步比步行消耗更多热量;(2)步行1英里的热量消耗随运动速度增加;(3)对于跑步速度,总热量消耗与最大摄氧量呈负相关。步行回归方程的自变量包括体重以及速度平方乘以体重(R² = 0.86)。跑步方程的自变量与步行方程相同,另外增加了速度乘以最大摄氧量(R² = 0.62)。