Keynes W M
Ann Surg. 1980 Feb;191(2):187-99. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198002000-00010.
In previous studies of human and experimental acute pancreatitis, three main assumptions have been made. First, that the disease is due to activation of pancreatic proteolytic enzymes in the pancreas with resulting "autodigestion" of the gland. Second, that interstitial pancreatitis is a mild form of hemorrhagic pancreatitis into which it may progress, and third, that bacteria play little part, if any, in the initiation of the disease. These assumptions are now questioned. In the present study in dogs, levels of proteolytic enzymes in blood, thoracicduct lymph and peritoneal fluid were measured using benzoylarginine amide. Raised levels of amidase were found in hemorrhagic, but not with interstitial, pancreatitis, and biochemical examination of amidase suggested it was not a pancreatic protease, but with its broad specificity and stability derived from bacteria. Addition of antibiotic to the blind duodenal loop in hemorrhagic pancreatitis reduced the level of blood amidase, but Trasylol given intravenously did not, nor did it inhibit amidase in vitro. In all animals, histological examination was made of the pancreas at time of death. On bacteriology, it is concluded that experimental interstitial pancreatitis results from damage to the pancreatic duct system without infection, and haemorrhagic pancreatitis mainly from reflux of bacteria into the pancreatic ducts from the duodenum. Only bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Clostridium welchii that produce proteolytic enzymes and cytotoxins appear to be able to cause haemorrhagic pancreatitis, and these bacteria may explain the release of vasoactive polypeptides and the vascular effects. In hemorrhagic pancreatitis such bacteria were found in the pancreas, but none in interstitial pancreatitis. Evidence is given to suggest that pancreatic proteolytic enzymes are unlikely to cause the cell necrosis which is a pathological feature of hemorrhagic pancreatitis, and that "autodigestion" is likewise unlikely to be a cause of this condition. An extrapancreatic source of proteolytic enzymes from bacteria is now suggested in haemorrhagic pancreatitis, and more attention to bacteriology in human acute pancreatitis is urgently needed. Amidase levels were highest in peritoneal fluid, suggesting a rationale for peritoneal lavage in the treatment of acute pancreatitis, and it is unlikely that Trasylol can give any benefit. The assessment of treatment of acute pancreatitis will be unsatisfactory as long as the proportion of haemorrhagic to interstitial pancreatitis in any series is not known accurately.
在以往关于人类和实验性急性胰腺炎的研究中,主要有三个假设。其一,该疾病是由于胰腺中胰蛋白水解酶的激活,从而导致胰腺的“自身消化”。其二,间质性胰腺炎是出血性胰腺炎的一种轻度形式,间质性胰腺炎可能会发展为出血性胰腺炎,其三,细菌在该疾病的起始过程中即便有作用,作用也很小。现在这些假设受到了质疑。在当前这项针对犬类的研究中,使用苯甲酰精氨酸酰胺测定了血液、胸导管淋巴液和腹腔液中蛋白水解酶的水平。发现在出血性胰腺炎中酰胺酶水平升高,但间质性胰腺炎中未升高,并且对酰胺酶的生化检测表明它不是一种胰腺蛋白酶,而是因其广泛的特异性和源于细菌的稳定性。在出血性胰腺炎中,向盲端十二指肠环添加抗生素可降低血液中酰胺酶的水平,但静脉注射抑肽酶则无效,而且抑肽酶在体外也不能抑制酰胺酶。在所有动物死亡时都对胰腺进行了组织学检查。从细菌学角度得出的结论是,实验性间质性胰腺炎是由胰腺导管系统受损而非感染引起的,而出血性胰腺炎主要是由细菌从十二指肠反流至胰腺导管所致。只有诸如大肠杆菌和产气荚膜梭菌等能产生蛋白水解酶和细胞毒素的细菌似乎能够引发出血性胰腺炎,并且这些细菌可能解释了血管活性多肽的释放及血管效应。在出血性胰腺炎的胰腺中发现了此类细菌,但在间质性胰腺炎中未发现。有证据表明,胰腺蛋白水解酶不太可能导致作为出血性胰腺炎病理特征的细胞坏死,同样,“自身消化”也不太可能是这种病症的病因。现在有人提出,出血性胰腺炎中蛋白水解酶的来源是胰腺外的细菌,因此迫切需要在人类急性胰腺炎研究中更多地关注细菌学。酰胺酶水平在腹腔液中最高,这为急性胰腺炎的腹腔灌洗治疗提供了理论依据,而且抑肽酶不太可能带来任何益处。只要在任何一组病例中出血性胰腺炎与间质性胰腺炎的比例不准确,对急性胰腺炎治疗效果的评估就会不尽人意。