血便免疫化学检测（hemoFEC）与隐血检测II型（Hemoccult II）的临床比较（作者译）
[Clinical comparison of hemoFEC with Hemoccult II (author's transl)].
作者信息
Gnauck R
出版信息
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1978 Oct 20;103(42):1648-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1129315.
PMID:699787
Abstract
Two technically improved methods of testing for occult blood in stool--hemoFEC and Hemoccult II--were compared by parallel tests in 1500 successive unselected out-patients. HemoFEC was positive in 1.9%, Hemoccult in 2.3%, the difference is not statistically significant. But there was a difference in the colour development of the two tests. Six cases of carcinoma, 14 of large polyps and six other sources of bleeding from the colon were revealed in the course of this study.
摘要
通过对1500例连续的未经挑选的门诊患者进行平行测试，比较了两种技术改进的粪便潜血检测方法——血红蛋白免疫法（hemoFEC）和隐血试验二代（Hemoccult II）。血红蛋白免疫法的阳性率为1.9%，隐血试验二代为2.3%，差异无统计学意义。但两种检测方法的显色情况存在差异。在本研究过程中，发现了6例癌症、14例大肠息肉以及6例来自结肠的其他出血源。
Zotero 插件